促使痴呆症患者执行任务:什么有效,为什么有效?

H. Boyd, N. Evans, B. Carey-Smith, R. Orpwood
{"title":"促使痴呆症患者执行任务:什么有效,为什么有效?","authors":"H. Boyd, N. Evans, B. Carey-Smith, R. Orpwood","doi":"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This two-year project aims to investigate in detail how prompting can help to guide people with dementia through tasks independently in a domestic setting. Four formats of prompt (text, audio, video and picture) are being compared with each other during domestic user-testing visits, to establish the relative strengths and weaknesses of each format. The importance of providing overall task context at each step, and ways of manual or automatic forwarding to the next instruction, will also be explored. Early findings from user testing have shown that comparable text or audio prompts are more effective means of prompting than picture or video prompts, and that there is strong potential for people with dementia to be able to control the timing of the prompts to work through the task at their own pace. These findings will be combined and the prompts will be developed iteratively so that prototype pieces of prompting technology can be created to enable a person with dementia to successfully carry out a task independently.","PeriodicalId":444978,"journal":{"name":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prompting people with dementia to carry out tasks: What works and why?\",\"authors\":\"H. Boyd, N. Evans, B. Carey-Smith, R. Orpwood\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This two-year project aims to investigate in detail how prompting can help to guide people with dementia through tasks independently in a domestic setting. Four formats of prompt (text, audio, video and picture) are being compared with each other during domestic user-testing visits, to establish the relative strengths and weaknesses of each format. The importance of providing overall task context at each step, and ways of manual or automatic forwarding to the next instruction, will also be explored. Early findings from user testing have shown that comparable text or audio prompts are more effective means of prompting than picture or video prompts, and that there is strong potential for people with dementia to be able to control the timing of the prompts to work through the task at their own pace. These findings will be combined and the prompts will be developed iteratively so that prototype pieces of prompting technology can be created to enable a person with dementia to successfully carry out a task independently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这个为期两年的项目旨在详细调查提示如何帮助指导痴呆症患者在家庭环境中独立完成任务。在国内用户测试访问期间,对四种提示格式(文本、音频、视频和图片)进行对比,确定每种格式的相对优势和劣势。还将探讨在每个步骤中提供整体任务上下文的重要性,以及手动或自动转发到下一个指令的方法。用户测试的早期发现表明,可比的文本或音频提示比图片或视频提示更有效,而且痴呆症患者有很大的潜力能够控制提示的时间,以自己的速度完成任务。这些发现将被结合起来,提示将被迭代地开发,这样就可以创建提示技术的原型,使痴呆症患者能够成功地独立完成任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prompting people with dementia to carry out tasks: What works and why?
This two-year project aims to investigate in detail how prompting can help to guide people with dementia through tasks independently in a domestic setting. Four formats of prompt (text, audio, video and picture) are being compared with each other during domestic user-testing visits, to establish the relative strengths and weaknesses of each format. The importance of providing overall task context at each step, and ways of manual or automatic forwarding to the next instruction, will also be explored. Early findings from user testing have shown that comparable text or audio prompts are more effective means of prompting than picture or video prompts, and that there is strong potential for people with dementia to be able to control the timing of the prompts to work through the task at their own pace. These findings will be combined and the prompts will be developed iteratively so that prototype pieces of prompting technology can be created to enable a person with dementia to successfully carry out a task independently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信