Milan Palević
{"title":"POJEDINA ZNAČAJNA PITANjA RESTITUCIJE O ZLOUPOTREBI PRIVATIZACIJE I KVALITETU USLUGA","authors":"Milan Palević","doi":"10.46793/uvp21.409p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author tries to emphasize the importance of international and positive legal guarantee of property rights as well as the issue of return of confiscated property or market compensation, and especially to come to conclusions that would help better respect the human right to peaceful enjoyment of property. In that sense, certain judgments of the European Court of Human Rights were analyzed. Special attention in the paper is paid to the types of restitution and the low coefficient of compensation, which violates and calls into question the fairness of the process itself. A brief critical review of the privatization process was also made. Thus, it was pointed out that the restitution procedure should have been carried out first, and then privatization. The poor quality of services as a result of abuses in privatization was also pointed out.","PeriodicalId":349295,"journal":{"name":"USLUGE i vladavina prava","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USLUGE i vladavina prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.409p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,笔者试图强调对财产权的国际和积极的法律保障的重要性,以及归还被没收财产或市场赔偿问题,特别是得出有助于更好地尊重和平享有财产的人权的结论。在这个意义上,分析了欧洲人权法院的某些判决。本文特别关注的是赔偿的类型和低补偿系数,这违反并质疑了程序本身的公正性。还对私有化进程作了简短的批判性审查。因此,有人指出,本应首先执行恢复原状的程序,然后再进行私有化。有人还指出,由于私有化的弊端,服务的质量很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POJEDINA ZNAČAJNA PITANjA RESTITUCIJE O ZLOUPOTREBI PRIVATIZACIJE I KVALITETU USLUGA
In this paper, the author tries to emphasize the importance of international and positive legal guarantee of property rights as well as the issue of return of confiscated property or market compensation, and especially to come to conclusions that would help better respect the human right to peaceful enjoyment of property. In that sense, certain judgments of the European Court of Human Rights were analyzed. Special attention in the paper is paid to the types of restitution and the low coefficient of compensation, which violates and calls into question the fairness of the process itself. A brief critical review of the privatization process was also made. Thus, it was pointed out that the restitution procedure should have been carried out first, and then privatization. The poor quality of services as a result of abuses in privatization was also pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信