J. Lazdiņš, Ainārs Lerhis, Jānis Pleps, Ineta Ziemele
{"title":"拉脱维亚恢复独立的法律和历史因素","authors":"J. Lazdiņš, Ainārs Lerhis, Jānis Pleps, Ineta Ziemele","doi":"10.1163/22115897_01901_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Latvia claimed its continuity as a State after fifty years of unlawful occupation by the Soviet Union. International law contains several criteria for substantiating a claim for continuity of a State. Latvia attempted to ensure the continuity of the four elements of statehood and pre-occupation legal obligations both on the international and the national level.","PeriodicalId":261948,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal and Historical Elements of Latvia’s Restoration of Independence\",\"authors\":\"J. Lazdiņš, Ainārs Lerhis, Jānis Pleps, Ineta Ziemele\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22115897_01901_004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Latvia claimed its continuity as a State after fifty years of unlawful occupation by the Soviet Union. International law contains several criteria for substantiating a claim for continuity of a State. Latvia attempted to ensure the continuity of the four elements of statehood and pre-occupation legal obligations both on the international and the national level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01901_004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01901_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legal and Historical Elements of Latvia’s Restoration of Independence
Latvia claimed its continuity as a State after fifty years of unlawful occupation by the Soviet Union. International law contains several criteria for substantiating a claim for continuity of a State. Latvia attempted to ensure the continuity of the four elements of statehood and pre-occupation legal obligations both on the international and the national level.