缺陷专家系统软件的潜在法律责任理论

R. D. Sprague, L. Berkowitz
{"title":"缺陷专家系统软件的潜在法律责任理论","authors":"R. D. Sprague, L. Berkowitz","doi":"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors review legal theories of liability for defective software as well as other emerging theories which may be applied to expert system software's new roles in American society. The purpose of this work is to allow expert system developers to understand in advance the performance standards to which they potentially may be held. It is concluded that legal theories will have to be expanded in order to directly establish tort liability due to defects in the software.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":232478,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential theories of legal liability for defective expert system software\",\"authors\":\"R. D. Sprague, L. Berkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors review legal theories of liability for defective software as well as other emerging theories which may be applied to expert system software's new roles in American society. The purpose of this work is to allow expert system developers to understand in advance the performance standards to which they potentially may be held. It is concluded that legal theories will have to be expanded in order to directly establish tort liability due to defects in the software.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":232478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

作者回顾了缺陷软件责任的法律理论,以及其他可能适用于专家系统软件在美国社会中的新角色的新兴理论。这项工作的目的是允许专家系统开发人员提前了解他们可能持有的性能标准。结论是,为了直接确立软件缺陷的侵权责任,法律理论必须扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential theories of legal liability for defective expert system software
The authors review legal theories of liability for defective software as well as other emerging theories which may be applied to expert system software's new roles in American society. The purpose of this work is to allow expert system developers to understand in advance the performance standards to which they potentially may be held. It is concluded that legal theories will have to be expanded in order to directly establish tort liability due to defects in the software.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信