美国和英国的仲裁:比较研究

Sankalp Jain
{"title":"美国和英国的仲裁:比较研究","authors":"Sankalp Jain","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3901913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration grew out of the need to settle disputes in an efficient and specialised manner, as an alternative to litigation. Importance of this mechanism, as a substitute means to resolve commercial disputes, has grown significantly in the recent decades, particularly in the international scenario. But the effectiveness of any arbitration proceeding goes to the root of the national law governing arbitration (substantive law) that determines the ambit of powers exercisable by the arbitrator and ultimately decides upon the enforcement of the award. Though there are international guidelines which have called for certain uniformity, in the domestic legislations on arbitration, many world nations have adopted laws in the manner suitable to their national requirements. Thus, the fate of international arbitrators still rests upon the prudent choice of national laws by the parties. At this juncture, it would not be an inappropriate exercise to make a comparative analysis on the laws governing arbitration as it exists in two of the prominent jurisdictions in the world- USA and UK.","PeriodicalId":198334,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitration in USA and UK: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Sankalp Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3901913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbitration grew out of the need to settle disputes in an efficient and specialised manner, as an alternative to litigation. Importance of this mechanism, as a substitute means to resolve commercial disputes, has grown significantly in the recent decades, particularly in the international scenario. But the effectiveness of any arbitration proceeding goes to the root of the national law governing arbitration (substantive law) that determines the ambit of powers exercisable by the arbitrator and ultimately decides upon the enforcement of the award. Though there are international guidelines which have called for certain uniformity, in the domestic legislations on arbitration, many world nations have adopted laws in the manner suitable to their national requirements. Thus, the fate of international arbitrators still rests upon the prudent choice of national laws by the parties. At this juncture, it would not be an inappropriate exercise to make a comparative analysis on the laws governing arbitration as it exists in two of the prominent jurisdictions in the world- USA and UK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"487 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仲裁产生于以有效和专门的方式解决争端的需要,作为诉讼的替代办法。这一机制作为解决商业争端的替代手段,其重要性在近几十年来,特别是在国际形势下显著增加。但是,任何仲裁程序的有效性都源于管辖仲裁的国家法律(实体法),它决定了仲裁员可行使权力的范围,并最终决定了裁决的执行。虽然有一些国际准则要求一定程度的统一,但在国内仲裁立法方面,世界上许多国家都以适合本国要求的方式制定法律。因此,国际仲裁员的命运仍然取决于当事各方对国内法的审慎选择。在这个关键时刻,对世界上两个主要司法管辖区-美国和英国-的仲裁法律进行比较分析并不是一个不恰当的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitration in USA and UK: A Comparative Study
Arbitration grew out of the need to settle disputes in an efficient and specialised manner, as an alternative to litigation. Importance of this mechanism, as a substitute means to resolve commercial disputes, has grown significantly in the recent decades, particularly in the international scenario. But the effectiveness of any arbitration proceeding goes to the root of the national law governing arbitration (substantive law) that determines the ambit of powers exercisable by the arbitrator and ultimately decides upon the enforcement of the award. Though there are international guidelines which have called for certain uniformity, in the domestic legislations on arbitration, many world nations have adopted laws in the manner suitable to their national requirements. Thus, the fate of international arbitrators still rests upon the prudent choice of national laws by the parties. At this juncture, it would not be an inappropriate exercise to make a comparative analysis on the laws governing arbitration as it exists in two of the prominent jurisdictions in the world- USA and UK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信