坏疽性脓皮病与低社会经济地位有关:一项单点横断面研究

Vromans Anna Maria, Williams Josiah, Bashyam Arjun M, Huang William W, F. Steven R., Strowd Lindsay C
{"title":"坏疽性脓皮病与低社会经济地位有关:一项单点横断面研究","authors":"Vromans Anna Maria, Williams Josiah, Bashyam Arjun M, Huang William W, F. Steven R., Strowd Lindsay C","doi":"10.23937/2469-5750/1510105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon, non-infectious, inflammatory skin disorder affecting individuals of all ages. Research characterizing socioeconomic status (SES) of this patient population is limited. Understanding the SES of a patient population is vital to providing a personalized approach for disease management that addresses potential barriers including transportation, work flexibility, cost of medications, and wound care. Objective: Determine if socioeconomic status and healthcare insurance coverage differs between patients with PG and other dermatology or healthcare system patient populations. Methods: A single-institution retrospective study of 255 adults with a history of PG, diagnosed between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020 was conducted. PG patients were compared to the following age and sex-matched cohorts: 1) Any dermatology patients without PG, 2) Psoriasis patients, 3) Atopic dermatitis patients, 4) Skin cancer patients, and 5) Any healthcare system patients. Demographic and insurance data were collected. SES was determined based on a previously validated algorithm utilizing primary residence zip code. Results: Approximately 33% of patients with PG had very low SES, defined by SES index scores in the lowest two gross income deciles, compared to 20% among the general healthcare system patient population. Medicare was the most common primary insurance at 47% of PG cohort. Medicaid was the primary insurance in 14% of PG patients. Uninsured patients comprised 11% of the PG cohort compared to 7.6% of dermatology patients and 4% of the general healthcare system patient population. Limitations: As a single-site study, results may vary based on practice type and geographic location. Conclusions: Patients with PG have lower SES and are more likely to have government insurance or no insurance than other medical and dermatology patient populations. Physicians should recognize additional barriers these patients may face in the treatment of a condition that can be difficult to manage.","PeriodicalId":237664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pyoderma Gangrenosum is Associated with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Single-Site, Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Vromans Anna Maria, Williams Josiah, Bashyam Arjun M, Huang William W, F. Steven R., Strowd Lindsay C\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2469-5750/1510105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon, non-infectious, inflammatory skin disorder affecting individuals of all ages. Research characterizing socioeconomic status (SES) of this patient population is limited. Understanding the SES of a patient population is vital to providing a personalized approach for disease management that addresses potential barriers including transportation, work flexibility, cost of medications, and wound care. Objective: Determine if socioeconomic status and healthcare insurance coverage differs between patients with PG and other dermatology or healthcare system patient populations. Methods: A single-institution retrospective study of 255 adults with a history of PG, diagnosed between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020 was conducted. PG patients were compared to the following age and sex-matched cohorts: 1) Any dermatology patients without PG, 2) Psoriasis patients, 3) Atopic dermatitis patients, 4) Skin cancer patients, and 5) Any healthcare system patients. Demographic and insurance data were collected. SES was determined based on a previously validated algorithm utilizing primary residence zip code. Results: Approximately 33% of patients with PG had very low SES, defined by SES index scores in the lowest two gross income deciles, compared to 20% among the general healthcare system patient population. Medicare was the most common primary insurance at 47% of PG cohort. Medicaid was the primary insurance in 14% of PG patients. Uninsured patients comprised 11% of the PG cohort compared to 7.6% of dermatology patients and 4% of the general healthcare system patient population. Limitations: As a single-site study, results may vary based on practice type and geographic location. Conclusions: Patients with PG have lower SES and are more likely to have government insurance or no insurance than other medical and dermatology patient populations. Physicians should recognize additional barriers these patients may face in the treatment of a condition that can be difficult to manage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5750/1510105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5750/1510105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坏疽性脓皮病(PG)是一种罕见的、非传染性的炎症性皮肤病,影响所有年龄的个体。研究表征社会经济地位(SES)的这一患者群体是有限的。了解患者群体的社会经济状况对于提供个性化的疾病管理方法至关重要,这些方法可以解决潜在的障碍,包括交通、工作灵活性、药物成本和伤口护理。目的:确定PG患者与其他皮肤病或医疗保健系统患者群体之间的社会经济地位和医疗保险覆盖率是否存在差异。方法:对2010年1月1日至2020年1月1日诊断为PG病史的255名成人进行单机构回顾性研究。将PG患者与以下年龄和性别匹配的队列进行比较:1)任何没有PG的皮肤病患者,2)牛皮癣患者,3)特应性皮炎患者,4)皮肤癌患者,5)任何医疗保健系统患者。收集了人口统计和保险数据。SES是基于先前验证的算法,利用主要居住地邮政编码来确定的。结果:大约33%的PG患者的SES非常低,由最低两个总收入十分位数的SES指数评分定义,而在一般医疗保健系统患者群体中,这一比例为20%。医疗保险是最常见的基本保险,占PG队列的47%。医疗补助是14% PG患者的主要保险。未保险患者占PG队列的11%,而皮肤科患者占7.6%,一般医疗保健系统患者占4%。局限性:作为一项单点研究,结果可能因实践类型和地理位置而异。结论:PG患者的社会经济地位较低,与其他内科和皮肤科患者相比,更有可能有政府保险或没有保险。医生应该认识到这些患者在治疗这种难以控制的疾病时可能面临的额外障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pyoderma Gangrenosum is Associated with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Single-Site, Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon, non-infectious, inflammatory skin disorder affecting individuals of all ages. Research characterizing socioeconomic status (SES) of this patient population is limited. Understanding the SES of a patient population is vital to providing a personalized approach for disease management that addresses potential barriers including transportation, work flexibility, cost of medications, and wound care. Objective: Determine if socioeconomic status and healthcare insurance coverage differs between patients with PG and other dermatology or healthcare system patient populations. Methods: A single-institution retrospective study of 255 adults with a history of PG, diagnosed between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020 was conducted. PG patients were compared to the following age and sex-matched cohorts: 1) Any dermatology patients without PG, 2) Psoriasis patients, 3) Atopic dermatitis patients, 4) Skin cancer patients, and 5) Any healthcare system patients. Demographic and insurance data were collected. SES was determined based on a previously validated algorithm utilizing primary residence zip code. Results: Approximately 33% of patients with PG had very low SES, defined by SES index scores in the lowest two gross income deciles, compared to 20% among the general healthcare system patient population. Medicare was the most common primary insurance at 47% of PG cohort. Medicaid was the primary insurance in 14% of PG patients. Uninsured patients comprised 11% of the PG cohort compared to 7.6% of dermatology patients and 4% of the general healthcare system patient population. Limitations: As a single-site study, results may vary based on practice type and geographic location. Conclusions: Patients with PG have lower SES and are more likely to have government insurance or no insurance than other medical and dermatology patient populations. Physicians should recognize additional barriers these patients may face in the treatment of a condition that can be difficult to manage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信