酒精性暴力患者的延迟折扣与攻击行为

Seung U Lim, Young-gun Ko
{"title":"酒精性暴力患者的延迟折扣与攻击行为","authors":"Seung U Lim, Young-gun Ko","doi":"10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study examined the difference in aggression and impulsivity between alcoholics who displayed violent behavior and those who did not. There was a popular notion for the alcohol-fuelled violence, that it was mainly the alcohol that made an individual impulsive, and therefore leading to violent acts. However, by examining the difference in impulsivity and aggression amongst violent alcoholics and non-violent alcoholics, the current study aimed to determine how much of predisposed impulsivity and aggression those who commit alcohol-fuelled violence have. Therefore, this study will examine; 1) whether there is a clear difference in aggression between those who display alcohol-fuelled violence and those who simply display alcoholic dependence, and 2) whether impulsiveness of those 2 groups can be differentiated. Methods: Each participant was given a questionnaire to complete, which included a demographic survey, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). The delay discounting task was carried out in a private room, and each participant was brought in individually. After the subjects understood the process of the experiment and completed the example, they were told to select between hypothetical money they could receive today (equivalent of $500) and hypothetical money they could receive 5 years from now (equivalent of $1000). The delayed period in which the future rewards were presented in either a descending sequence or an ascending sequence, (for example, from 1week up to 5 years). Same procedure was repeated with $3000 and $5000, and the ascending or descending order was selected randomly on each 3 procedures. Results: By comparing the Aggression Questionnaire and Barratt impulsiveness scale, the results showed that both the non-violent group and violent alcoholic group scored higher than the control group on Barratt impulsiveness scale. The results also showed that while the non-violent alcoholic group and violent alcoholic group did not show a major difference in impulsivity, violent alcoholic group showed higher level of aggression than the non-violent group. While the impulsivity measured by BIS scale did not show significant difference between the non-violent and violent alcoholics, further study examining the behavioral aspect of impulsivity could lead to a better understanding of the difference between the two. The results from the study suggested that while the non-violent alcoholic group had higher level of discounting than the control group, its difference was not significant. However, the discounting rate in which violent alcoholic group was greater than the other 2 groups in every trial. Also, the rate in which future reward is discounted is higher for smaller future outcome.","PeriodicalId":115450,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Delay Discounting and Aggression of Patients with Alcohol-Fuelled Violence\",\"authors\":\"Seung U Lim, Young-gun Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The present study examined the difference in aggression and impulsivity between alcoholics who displayed violent behavior and those who did not. There was a popular notion for the alcohol-fuelled violence, that it was mainly the alcohol that made an individual impulsive, and therefore leading to violent acts. However, by examining the difference in impulsivity and aggression amongst violent alcoholics and non-violent alcoholics, the current study aimed to determine how much of predisposed impulsivity and aggression those who commit alcohol-fuelled violence have. Therefore, this study will examine; 1) whether there is a clear difference in aggression between those who display alcohol-fuelled violence and those who simply display alcoholic dependence, and 2) whether impulsiveness of those 2 groups can be differentiated. Methods: Each participant was given a questionnaire to complete, which included a demographic survey, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). The delay discounting task was carried out in a private room, and each participant was brought in individually. After the subjects understood the process of the experiment and completed the example, they were told to select between hypothetical money they could receive today (equivalent of $500) and hypothetical money they could receive 5 years from now (equivalent of $1000). The delayed period in which the future rewards were presented in either a descending sequence or an ascending sequence, (for example, from 1week up to 5 years). Same procedure was repeated with $3000 and $5000, and the ascending or descending order was selected randomly on each 3 procedures. Results: By comparing the Aggression Questionnaire and Barratt impulsiveness scale, the results showed that both the non-violent group and violent alcoholic group scored higher than the control group on Barratt impulsiveness scale. The results also showed that while the non-violent alcoholic group and violent alcoholic group did not show a major difference in impulsivity, violent alcoholic group showed higher level of aggression than the non-violent group. While the impulsivity measured by BIS scale did not show significant difference between the non-violent and violent alcoholics, further study examining the behavioral aspect of impulsivity could lead to a better understanding of the difference between the two. The results from the study suggested that while the non-violent alcoholic group had higher level of discounting than the control group, its difference was not significant. However, the discounting rate in which violent alcoholic group was greater than the other 2 groups in every trial. Also, the rate in which future reward is discounted is higher for smaller future outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨有暴力行为的酗酒者与无暴力行为的酗酒者在攻击性和冲动性方面的差异。对于酒精引发的暴力,有一种流行的观念,认为主要是酒精使人冲动,从而导致暴力行为。然而,通过检查暴力酗酒者和非暴力酗酒者在冲动和攻击性方面的差异,目前的研究旨在确定那些因酒精而实施暴力的人有多少先天冲动和攻击性。因此,本研究将检验;1)表现出酒精引发的暴力行为的人与单纯表现出酒精依赖的人在攻击性上是否有明显差异,2)能否区分这两组人的冲动。方法:采用人口统计学调查、酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)、Barratt冲动性量表(BIS)、Beck抑郁量表(BDI-II)和攻击行为问卷(AQ),对被试进行问卷调查。延迟折扣任务在一个单独的房间里进行,每个参与者都被单独带进来。在受试者理解了实验的过程并完成了这个例子之后,他们被告知在他们今天可以收到的假设的钱(相当于500美元)和他们5年后可以收到的假设的钱(相当于1000美元)之间做出选择。未来奖励以降序或升序呈现的延迟时期(例如,从1周到5年)。用3000美元和5000美元重复同样的程序,在每3个程序中随机选择升序或降序。结果:通过对攻击问卷和Barratt冲动量表的比较,结果显示非暴力组和暴力酗酒组的Barratt冲动量表得分均高于对照组。结果还表明,虽然非暴力酗酒组和暴力酗酒组在冲动方面没有显着差异,但暴力酗酒组的攻击性水平高于非暴力酗酒组。虽然BIS量表测量的冲动性在非暴力酗酒者和暴力酗酒者之间没有显着差异,但进一步研究冲动性的行为方面可以更好地理解两者之间的差异。研究结果表明,虽然非暴力酗酒组的折扣水平高于对照组,但差异并不显著。但每次试验中,暴力酗酒组的折现率均大于其他两组。而且,未来收益越小,未来收益的折现率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Delay Discounting and Aggression of Patients with Alcohol-Fuelled Violence
Objective: The present study examined the difference in aggression and impulsivity between alcoholics who displayed violent behavior and those who did not. There was a popular notion for the alcohol-fuelled violence, that it was mainly the alcohol that made an individual impulsive, and therefore leading to violent acts. However, by examining the difference in impulsivity and aggression amongst violent alcoholics and non-violent alcoholics, the current study aimed to determine how much of predisposed impulsivity and aggression those who commit alcohol-fuelled violence have. Therefore, this study will examine; 1) whether there is a clear difference in aggression between those who display alcohol-fuelled violence and those who simply display alcoholic dependence, and 2) whether impulsiveness of those 2 groups can be differentiated. Methods: Each participant was given a questionnaire to complete, which included a demographic survey, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). The delay discounting task was carried out in a private room, and each participant was brought in individually. After the subjects understood the process of the experiment and completed the example, they were told to select between hypothetical money they could receive today (equivalent of $500) and hypothetical money they could receive 5 years from now (equivalent of $1000). The delayed period in which the future rewards were presented in either a descending sequence or an ascending sequence, (for example, from 1week up to 5 years). Same procedure was repeated with $3000 and $5000, and the ascending or descending order was selected randomly on each 3 procedures. Results: By comparing the Aggression Questionnaire and Barratt impulsiveness scale, the results showed that both the non-violent group and violent alcoholic group scored higher than the control group on Barratt impulsiveness scale. The results also showed that while the non-violent alcoholic group and violent alcoholic group did not show a major difference in impulsivity, violent alcoholic group showed higher level of aggression than the non-violent group. While the impulsivity measured by BIS scale did not show significant difference between the non-violent and violent alcoholics, further study examining the behavioral aspect of impulsivity could lead to a better understanding of the difference between the two. The results from the study suggested that while the non-violent alcoholic group had higher level of discounting than the control group, its difference was not significant. However, the discounting rate in which violent alcoholic group was greater than the other 2 groups in every trial. Also, the rate in which future reward is discounted is higher for smaller future outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信