{"title":"急性呼吸衰竭患儿的无创通气","authors":"A. López","doi":"10.47275/2379-6707-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic and clinical interest in noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is high (Figure 1). The NIV isn’t often used. The evidence overwhelmingly favors its usage in those who are experiencing COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) exacerbations and people who have acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute and chronic respiratory illnesses were the cause of 8% of child fatalities, 20% of weekly GP visits, and 15% of hospital admissions in the UK in 2001 [1]. Increased proof of efficacy, advancements in ventilator technology, and pediatric user interface design, as well as public and physician awareness, are all potential contributing factors. Numerous of these kids were raised at home [2, 3]. When used in conjunction with ventilatory support, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions can be decreased [4] and hospital release following ventilatory decompensation can be facilitated [5]. Even though many instances are benign and self-limited, some individuals need more advanced respiratory care. In many situations of ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a crucial strategy; yet endotracheal intubation (ETI) has obvious dangers [6].","PeriodicalId":355368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure\",\"authors\":\"A. López\",\"doi\":\"10.47275/2379-6707-116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic and clinical interest in noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is high (Figure 1). The NIV isn’t often used. The evidence overwhelmingly favors its usage in those who are experiencing COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) exacerbations and people who have acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute and chronic respiratory illnesses were the cause of 8% of child fatalities, 20% of weekly GP visits, and 15% of hospital admissions in the UK in 2001 [1]. Increased proof of efficacy, advancements in ventilator technology, and pediatric user interface design, as well as public and physician awareness, are all potential contributing factors. Numerous of these kids were raised at home [2, 3]. When used in conjunction with ventilatory support, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions can be decreased [4] and hospital release following ventilatory decompensation can be facilitated [5]. Even though many instances are benign and self-limited, some individuals need more advanced respiratory care. In many situations of ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a crucial strategy; yet endotracheal intubation (ETI) has obvious dangers [6].\",\"PeriodicalId\":355368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47275/2379-6707-116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47275/2379-6707-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure
Academic and clinical interest in noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is high (Figure 1). The NIV isn’t often used. The evidence overwhelmingly favors its usage in those who are experiencing COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) exacerbations and people who have acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute and chronic respiratory illnesses were the cause of 8% of child fatalities, 20% of weekly GP visits, and 15% of hospital admissions in the UK in 2001 [1]. Increased proof of efficacy, advancements in ventilator technology, and pediatric user interface design, as well as public and physician awareness, are all potential contributing factors. Numerous of these kids were raised at home [2, 3]. When used in conjunction with ventilatory support, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions can be decreased [4] and hospital release following ventilatory decompensation can be facilitated [5]. Even though many instances are benign and self-limited, some individuals need more advanced respiratory care. In many situations of ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a crucial strategy; yet endotracheal intubation (ETI) has obvious dangers [6].