评价基督教社会服务委员会儿童保护项目在坦桑尼亚基巴哈地区目标小学确保无暴力学习环境所采取的战略

Gurisha Eliakunda, Victorini Salema, A. Chidyau
{"title":"评价基督教社会服务委员会儿童保护项目在坦桑尼亚基巴哈地区目标小学确保无暴力学习环境所采取的战略","authors":"Gurisha Eliakunda, Victorini Salema, A. Chidyau","doi":"10.37745/ijeld.2013/vol10n986103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study evaluated the strategies adopted by CSSC project in ensuring violence free learning environment and prevention of child abuse in targeted primary schools in Kibaha District. The study was a summative evaluation which was guided by Context, Input, Process and Product model (CIPP) developed by Daniel Stufflebeam in 1971. Convergent design under mixed research was adopted whereby qualitative and quantitative data were collected at the same time and analyzed separately. The targeted population for the study included 4 schools, 4 heads teachers,72 teachers,783 students, a project manager and 48 school committee members hence the total of 908 participants. Probability and non-probability sampling were used in selecting respondents. The instruments for data collection were questionnaire, interview guide, focus group discussion and document analysis guide. The reliability of quantitative instruments was established through Cronbach Alpha; (r = 0.608 for teachers’ questionnaire and r = 0.653 for students’ questionnaire) while the reliability for the qualitative data was established through triangulation of data. Quantitative data was coded and analyzed using percentages and frequencies through statistical Package of Social Science Version 26 and presented in tables. Qualitative data was analyzed by coding contents into themes and presented in narrative form and direct quotations from respondents. Findings shows the positive response from teachers, head teachers, students and community members that project employed training, group discussions, presentation and initiation of child protection clubs in targeted primary schools. However, the findings show that the strategies employed did not managed to cover large number of teachers, students and community members in project activities conducted. The study concluded that strategies employed by CSSC child protection project in ensuring violence free learning environment in targeted primary schools were training, group discussions, presentation and formation of child protection clubs which were not able to ensure that a large number of teachers, students and community members to were involved. Study recommended that project owner should train more teachers, students, and community members to ensure adequate number of teachers, students and community members are involved in project activities.","PeriodicalId":189190,"journal":{"name":"international journal of Education, Learning and Development","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Strategies Adopted by Christian Social Service Commission Child Protection Project in Ensuring Violence Free Learning Environment in Targeted Primary Schools in Kibaha District, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Gurisha Eliakunda, Victorini Salema, A. Chidyau\",\"doi\":\"10.37745/ijeld.2013/vol10n986103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study evaluated the strategies adopted by CSSC project in ensuring violence free learning environment and prevention of child abuse in targeted primary schools in Kibaha District. The study was a summative evaluation which was guided by Context, Input, Process and Product model (CIPP) developed by Daniel Stufflebeam in 1971. Convergent design under mixed research was adopted whereby qualitative and quantitative data were collected at the same time and analyzed separately. The targeted population for the study included 4 schools, 4 heads teachers,72 teachers,783 students, a project manager and 48 school committee members hence the total of 908 participants. Probability and non-probability sampling were used in selecting respondents. The instruments for data collection were questionnaire, interview guide, focus group discussion and document analysis guide. The reliability of quantitative instruments was established through Cronbach Alpha; (r = 0.608 for teachers’ questionnaire and r = 0.653 for students’ questionnaire) while the reliability for the qualitative data was established through triangulation of data. Quantitative data was coded and analyzed using percentages and frequencies through statistical Package of Social Science Version 26 and presented in tables. Qualitative data was analyzed by coding contents into themes and presented in narrative form and direct quotations from respondents. Findings shows the positive response from teachers, head teachers, students and community members that project employed training, group discussions, presentation and initiation of child protection clubs in targeted primary schools. However, the findings show that the strategies employed did not managed to cover large number of teachers, students and community members in project activities conducted. The study concluded that strategies employed by CSSC child protection project in ensuring violence free learning environment in targeted primary schools were training, group discussions, presentation and formation of child protection clubs which were not able to ensure that a large number of teachers, students and community members to were involved. Study recommended that project owner should train more teachers, students, and community members to ensure adequate number of teachers, students and community members are involved in project activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"international journal of Education, Learning and Development\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"international journal of Education, Learning and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeld.2013/vol10n986103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international journal of Education, Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeld.2013/vol10n986103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究评估了CSSC项目在确保基巴哈区目标小学无暴力学习环境和防止虐待儿童方面采取的战略。本研究是以Daniel Stufflebeam于1971年提出的情境、输入、过程和产品模型(CIPP)为指导的总结性评价。采用混合研究下的收敛设计,同时收集定性和定量数据,分别进行分析。研究对象包括4所学校、4名校长、72名教师、783名学生、1名项目经理和48名学校委员会成员,共908名参与者。调查对象的选择采用概率抽样和非概率抽样。数据收集工具为问卷调查、访谈指南、焦点小组讨论和文献分析指南。通过Cronbach Alpha法建立定量工具的可靠性;(教师问卷r = 0.608,学生问卷r = 0.653),定性数据的信度通过数据三角剖分确定。定量数据通过统计软件包的社会科学版本26使用百分比和频率进行编码和分析,并在表格中呈现。定性数据通过将内容编码为主题,并以叙事形式和直接引用受访者的方式呈现。调查结果显示,该项目在目标小学开展了培训、小组讨论、介绍和发起儿童保护俱乐部,得到了教师、校长、学生和社区成员的积极回应。然而,调查结果表明,所采用的策略未能在开展的项目活动中覆盖大量的教师、学生和社区成员。研究认为,中国社委儿童保护项目在目标小学确保无暴力学习环境的策略是培训、小组讨论、演讲和成立儿童保护俱乐部,无法确保大量的教师、学生和社区成员参与。研究建议,项目业主应培训更多的教师、学生和社区成员,以确保有足够数量的教师、学生和社区成员参与项目活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Strategies Adopted by Christian Social Service Commission Child Protection Project in Ensuring Violence Free Learning Environment in Targeted Primary Schools in Kibaha District, Tanzania
The study evaluated the strategies adopted by CSSC project in ensuring violence free learning environment and prevention of child abuse in targeted primary schools in Kibaha District. The study was a summative evaluation which was guided by Context, Input, Process and Product model (CIPP) developed by Daniel Stufflebeam in 1971. Convergent design under mixed research was adopted whereby qualitative and quantitative data were collected at the same time and analyzed separately. The targeted population for the study included 4 schools, 4 heads teachers,72 teachers,783 students, a project manager and 48 school committee members hence the total of 908 participants. Probability and non-probability sampling were used in selecting respondents. The instruments for data collection were questionnaire, interview guide, focus group discussion and document analysis guide. The reliability of quantitative instruments was established through Cronbach Alpha; (r = 0.608 for teachers’ questionnaire and r = 0.653 for students’ questionnaire) while the reliability for the qualitative data was established through triangulation of data. Quantitative data was coded and analyzed using percentages and frequencies through statistical Package of Social Science Version 26 and presented in tables. Qualitative data was analyzed by coding contents into themes and presented in narrative form and direct quotations from respondents. Findings shows the positive response from teachers, head teachers, students and community members that project employed training, group discussions, presentation and initiation of child protection clubs in targeted primary schools. However, the findings show that the strategies employed did not managed to cover large number of teachers, students and community members in project activities conducted. The study concluded that strategies employed by CSSC child protection project in ensuring violence free learning environment in targeted primary schools were training, group discussions, presentation and formation of child protection clubs which were not able to ensure that a large number of teachers, students and community members to were involved. Study recommended that project owner should train more teachers, students, and community members to ensure adequate number of teachers, students and community members are involved in project activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信