Sümeyye Yavuz
{"title":"Abdüllatif Harpûtî’nin İsbât-ı Vâcib Delilleri","authors":"Sümeyye Yavuz","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abdullatif Harpūtī (d.1916) was a late Ottoman scholar who worked as a professor of \"Kalām\" at the Istanbul Darulfunun. Recognizing the deficiencies in the science of kalām and arguing that some changes should be made in terms of method and content, Harpūtī states that the time has come for the third compilation in the science of kalām and that this compilation is obligatory upon the scholars of the century. He himself tried to serve as a model for this period with his book Tanqīḥ al-kalām. His study, which consists of muqaddimah (preface), divinity, prophecy, sam'iyyāt, and imāmate chapters, deals with the currents of thought that emerged in the Western world by bringing evidence against them. Harpūtī states that the scientific data on matters of faith, which are put forward by rational methods, change over time. For this reason, while writing chapters such as divinity and prophecy, he used different information in light of the scientific data of his time. He also included and refuted the views of movements such as materialism, positivism, and atheism, which were newly widespread in his time. In this paper, we have analyzed the proofs used by al Harpūtī on the subject of ithbāt al-wājib.  Harpūtī analyzed the proofs of ithbāt al-wājib under the subheadings of \"the proofs of philosophers and muhaqqiq theologians\", \"the path followed by most theologians\", \"the path followed by the prophets and asfiyān\", and \"the recent theologian philosophers and ithbāt al-wājib”. These subheadings do not clearly indicate which of the classical proofs he means. By \"the proof of the philosophers and the muhaqqiq theologians\" Harpūtī meant the evidence of possibility (imkān); by \"the path followed by most theologians\" he meant the proof of existence (huduth); and by “the path followed by the Prophets and asfiyān\" he meant the evidence of purpose and order. Under the title “The recent theologian philosophers and ithbāt al-wājib\", he collected the proof of possibility, the proof of motion, and the proofs of purpose and order. The proof of the disposition (fıtrah) that is included in our study is not to be found in the titles. However, from Harpūtī 's explanations, we have determined that he also used this argument. This study aims to reveal the proofs of ithbāt al-wājib used by al Harpūtī . This research is significant for us to comprehend what evidence Harpūtī , who opened the door to the new science of Kalām and is considered one of the important figures of the new science of Kalām, used for proof. The documentation method was used in this research, and the data obtained were analyzed and reflected in the text. As a result of the research, it was determined that al Harpūtī used the proofs of possibility, existence, purpose and order, motion, and disposition.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Abdullatif Harpūtī(1916年)是一位已故的奥斯曼学者,曾在伊斯坦布尔达鲁富农大学担任Kalām教授。认识到kalām科学的不足,并认为在方法和内容方面应该做出一些改变,Harpūtī指出,kalām科学的第三次汇编的时间已经到来,这是本世纪学者的义务。他自己也试图成为这一时期的典范,他的书tanq ā z al-kalām。他的研究包括muqaddimah(序言),神性,预言,sam'iyyāt和imāmate章节,通过提出反对它们的证据来处理西方世界出现的思想潮流。Harpūtī指出,关于信仰问题的科学数据是通过理性方法提出的,随着时间的推移而变化。因此,在写神性和预言等章节时,他根据当时的科学数据使用了不同的信息。他还包括并驳斥了唯物主义、实证主义和无神论等运动的观点,这些运动在他的时代刚刚流行起来。在本文中,我们分析了al Harpūtī在ithbāt al-wājib主题上使用的证明。Harpūtī在“哲学家和穆哈奇克神学家的证明”、“大多数神学家遵循的道路”、“先知和asfiyān遵循的道路”和“最近的神学家哲学家和ithbāt al-wājib”的小标题下分析了ithbāt al-wājib的证明。这些小标题并没有清楚地表明他指的是哪一种经典证明。“哲学家和muhaqqiq神学家的证据”Harpūtī意味着可能性的证据(imkān);所谓“大多数神学家所遵循的道路”,他指的是存在的证明(huduth);他所说的“先知和asfiyān所遵循的道路”是指目的和秩序的证据。在题为“最近的神学家哲学家和ithbāt al-wājib”下,他收集了可能性的证明,运动的证明,目的和秩序的证明。我们的研究中包含的性格证明(fıtrah)在标题中找不到。然而,从Harpūtī的解释中,我们确定他也使用了这个论点。本研究旨在揭示al Harpūtī使用ithbāt al-wājib的证据。这项研究对于我们理解打开了Kalām新科学大门,被认为是Kalām新科学的重要人物之一的Harpūtī使用了哪些证据作为证据具有重要意义。本研究采用文献资料法,对获得的数据进行分析并在文中体现。研究结果表明,人工智能Harpūtī使用了可能性、存在性、目的和秩序、运动和处置的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abdüllatif Harpûtî’nin İsbât-ı Vâcib Delilleri
Abdullatif Harpūtī (d.1916) was a late Ottoman scholar who worked as a professor of "Kalām" at the Istanbul Darulfunun. Recognizing the deficiencies in the science of kalām and arguing that some changes should be made in terms of method and content, Harpūtī states that the time has come for the third compilation in the science of kalām and that this compilation is obligatory upon the scholars of the century. He himself tried to serve as a model for this period with his book Tanqīḥ al-kalām. His study, which consists of muqaddimah (preface), divinity, prophecy, sam'iyyāt, and imāmate chapters, deals with the currents of thought that emerged in the Western world by bringing evidence against them. Harpūtī states that the scientific data on matters of faith, which are put forward by rational methods, change over time. For this reason, while writing chapters such as divinity and prophecy, he used different information in light of the scientific data of his time. He also included and refuted the views of movements such as materialism, positivism, and atheism, which were newly widespread in his time. In this paper, we have analyzed the proofs used by al Harpūtī on the subject of ithbāt al-wājib.  Harpūtī analyzed the proofs of ithbāt al-wājib under the subheadings of "the proofs of philosophers and muhaqqiq theologians", "the path followed by most theologians", "the path followed by the prophets and asfiyān", and "the recent theologian philosophers and ithbāt al-wājib”. These subheadings do not clearly indicate which of the classical proofs he means. By "the proof of the philosophers and the muhaqqiq theologians" Harpūtī meant the evidence of possibility (imkān); by "the path followed by most theologians" he meant the proof of existence (huduth); and by “the path followed by the Prophets and asfiyān" he meant the evidence of purpose and order. Under the title “The recent theologian philosophers and ithbāt al-wājib", he collected the proof of possibility, the proof of motion, and the proofs of purpose and order. The proof of the disposition (fıtrah) that is included in our study is not to be found in the titles. However, from Harpūtī 's explanations, we have determined that he also used this argument. This study aims to reveal the proofs of ithbāt al-wājib used by al Harpūtī . This research is significant for us to comprehend what evidence Harpūtī , who opened the door to the new science of Kalām and is considered one of the important figures of the new science of Kalām, used for proof. The documentation method was used in this research, and the data obtained were analyzed and reflected in the text. As a result of the research, it was determined that al Harpūtī used the proofs of possibility, existence, purpose and order, motion, and disposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信