{"title":"成文法时代的就业普通法的形成","authors":"Michael C. Harper","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2511265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current post-Erie age of statutes the Supreme Court continues to have potential influence over the development of a “general” common law used to decide recurring issues governed by state law. This influence, which has drawn little commentary, derives from the Court’s authority to consider analogous issues when filling gaps in federal statutes, sometimes through express reliance on general common law. The influence is through the power to persuade, like that of the federal judiciary in its general common lawmaking age of Swift, rather than through the power to command, like that of the federal judiciary in the formulation of the specialized federal common law of the post-Erie era. The Court’s post-Erie role in general common law making has been evident recently in a series of decisions interpreting federal employment statutes. In those decisions the Court has relied in part on common law as formulated in the Restatement Second of Agency, but also has modified that formulation in ways that could enhance the common law applied by state courts. The American Law Institute in turn has considered and in part relied upon the Court’s participation in the common law making process in the production of its Restatement of Employment Law, which will be granted final approval in May, 2014. By using examples from the Court’s recent employment law decisions, this article highlights how the Court can influence common law through its delegated authority to make law through statutory interpretation.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fashioning a General Common Law for Employment in an Age of Statutes\",\"authors\":\"Michael C. Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2511265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current post-Erie age of statutes the Supreme Court continues to have potential influence over the development of a “general” common law used to decide recurring issues governed by state law. This influence, which has drawn little commentary, derives from the Court’s authority to consider analogous issues when filling gaps in federal statutes, sometimes through express reliance on general common law. The influence is through the power to persuade, like that of the federal judiciary in its general common lawmaking age of Swift, rather than through the power to command, like that of the federal judiciary in the formulation of the specialized federal common law of the post-Erie era. The Court’s post-Erie role in general common law making has been evident recently in a series of decisions interpreting federal employment statutes. In those decisions the Court has relied in part on common law as formulated in the Restatement Second of Agency, but also has modified that formulation in ways that could enhance the common law applied by state courts. The American Law Institute in turn has considered and in part relied upon the Court’s participation in the common law making process in the production of its Restatement of Employment Law, which will be granted final approval in May, 2014. By using examples from the Court’s recent employment law decisions, this article highlights how the Court can influence common law through its delegated authority to make law through statutory interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2511265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2511265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在后伊利案时代,最高法院继续对用于裁决由州法管辖的反复出现的问题的"一般"普通法的发展具有潜在影响。这种影响很少引起评论,它源于最高法院在填补联邦法规空白时考虑类似问题的权力,有时是通过明确依赖一般普通法。这种影响是通过说服的权力产生的,就像斯威夫特时代的联邦司法机构那样,而不是通过命令的权力产生的,就像后伊利时代的联邦司法机构在制定专门的联邦普通法时所具有的权力。在最近一系列解释联邦就业法规的判决中,最高法院在后伊利案中在一般普通法制定中的作用已得到明显体现。在这些判决中,法院部分地依赖于《代理重述第二》中阐述的普通法,但也对该表述进行了修改,以加强州法院适用的普通法。反过来,美国法律协会在其《就业法重述》(Restatement of Employment Law)的制定过程中考虑并部分依赖于法院对普通法制定过程的参与,该重述将于2014年5月获得最终批准。本文以最高法院最近就雇佣法作出的裁决为例,强调最高法院如何通过法定解释的授权来影响普通法。
Fashioning a General Common Law for Employment in an Age of Statutes
In the current post-Erie age of statutes the Supreme Court continues to have potential influence over the development of a “general” common law used to decide recurring issues governed by state law. This influence, which has drawn little commentary, derives from the Court’s authority to consider analogous issues when filling gaps in federal statutes, sometimes through express reliance on general common law. The influence is through the power to persuade, like that of the federal judiciary in its general common lawmaking age of Swift, rather than through the power to command, like that of the federal judiciary in the formulation of the specialized federal common law of the post-Erie era. The Court’s post-Erie role in general common law making has been evident recently in a series of decisions interpreting federal employment statutes. In those decisions the Court has relied in part on common law as formulated in the Restatement Second of Agency, but also has modified that formulation in ways that could enhance the common law applied by state courts. The American Law Institute in turn has considered and in part relied upon the Court’s participation in the common law making process in the production of its Restatement of Employment Law, which will be granted final approval in May, 2014. By using examples from the Court’s recent employment law decisions, this article highlights how the Court can influence common law through its delegated authority to make law through statutory interpretation.