注重实效的安全

M. Bishop, R. Ford, M. Ramilli
{"title":"注重实效的安全","authors":"M. Bishop, R. Ford, M. Ramilli","doi":"10.1109/MALWARE.2011.6112325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current security practice is to examine incoming messages, commands, data, and executing processes for attacks that can then be countered. This position paper argues that this practice is counterproductive because the number and variety of attacks are far greater than we can cope with. We propose a results-oriented approach, in which one focuses on the step of the attack that realizes the compromise. Thus, the manner in which the compromise is effected becomes less important than the actual result, and prevention, detection, and recovery efforts are focused on that.","PeriodicalId":375300,"journal":{"name":"2011 6th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results-oriented security\",\"authors\":\"M. Bishop, R. Ford, M. Ramilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MALWARE.2011.6112325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current security practice is to examine incoming messages, commands, data, and executing processes for attacks that can then be countered. This position paper argues that this practice is counterproductive because the number and variety of attacks are far greater than we can cope with. We propose a results-oriented approach, in which one focuses on the step of the attack that realizes the compromise. Thus, the manner in which the compromise is effected becomes less important than the actual result, and prevention, detection, and recovery efforts are focused on that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 6th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 6th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALWARE.2011.6112325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 6th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALWARE.2011.6112325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当前的安全实践是检查传入的消息、命令、数据和执行过程,然后对攻击进行反击。这份立场文件认为,这种做法适得其反,因为攻击的数量和种类远远超过我们所能应付的。我们建议采取以结果为导向的方法,将重点放在实现妥协的攻击步骤上。因此,实现妥协的方式变得比实际结果更重要,预防、检测和恢复工作都集中在这一点上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results-oriented security
Current security practice is to examine incoming messages, commands, data, and executing processes for attacks that can then be countered. This position paper argues that this practice is counterproductive because the number and variety of attacks are far greater than we can cope with. We propose a results-oriented approach, in which one focuses on the step of the attack that realizes the compromise. Thus, the manner in which the compromise is effected becomes less important than the actual result, and prevention, detection, and recovery efforts are focused on that.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信