Klasifikasi MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database Metode Random Forest dan CNN dengan Model ResNet-50: A Systematic Literature Review

Although Machine Learning and Deep Learning technologies have been widely used and have shown high accuracy in many applications, including in the health field, their application in early detection of heart disease still has room for improvement. Further research is needed to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of this process. This study aims to understand and improve the process of ECG signal extraction and classification based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Essentially, this research aims to evaluate and compare various models, focusing on the Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models. The study reviews several related researches, especially those focusing on the process of extraction and classification of ECG signals using Machine Learning and Deep Learning. After extraction and classification of data, an evaluation and comparison process is conducted to determine the best performing model. From the research conducted, it was found that Machine Learning methods generally show an accuracy rate between 97.02% - 99.66%, with the Random Forest method having an accuracy of 97.02%. Meanwhile, the CNN method shows a higher accuracy rate, which is between 98.75% - 100%. Thus, this research confirms the superiority of CNN in this classification process, and shows potential for further use in early detection of heart disease.