基于云的交互式代理情感分析

M. Keijsers, C. Bartneck, H. Kazmi
{"title":"基于云的交互式代理情感分析","authors":"M. Keijsers, C. Bartneck, H. Kazmi","doi":"10.1145/3349537.3351883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotions play an important role in human-agent interaction. To realise natural interaction it is essential for an agent to be able to analyse the sentiment in users' utterances. Modern agents use a distributed service model in which their functions can be located on any number of computers including cloud-based servers. Outsourcing the speech recognition and sentiment analysis to a cloud service enables even simple agents to adapt their behaviour to the emotional state of their users. In this study we test whether sentiment analysis tools can accurately gauge sentiment in human-chatbot interaction. To that effect, we compare the quality of sentiment analysis obtained from three major suppliers of cloud-based sentiment analysis services (Microsoft, Amazon and Google). In addition, we compare their results with the leading lexicon-based software, as well as with human ratings. The results show that although the sentiment analysis tools agree moderately with each other, they do not correlate well with human ratings. While the cloud-based services would be an extremely useful tool for human-agent interaction, their current quality does not justify their usage in human-agent conversations.","PeriodicalId":188834,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cloud-Based Sentiment Analysis for Interactive Agents\",\"authors\":\"M. Keijsers, C. Bartneck, H. Kazmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3349537.3351883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emotions play an important role in human-agent interaction. To realise natural interaction it is essential for an agent to be able to analyse the sentiment in users' utterances. Modern agents use a distributed service model in which their functions can be located on any number of computers including cloud-based servers. Outsourcing the speech recognition and sentiment analysis to a cloud service enables even simple agents to adapt their behaviour to the emotional state of their users. In this study we test whether sentiment analysis tools can accurately gauge sentiment in human-chatbot interaction. To that effect, we compare the quality of sentiment analysis obtained from three major suppliers of cloud-based sentiment analysis services (Microsoft, Amazon and Google). In addition, we compare their results with the leading lexicon-based software, as well as with human ratings. The results show that although the sentiment analysis tools agree moderately with each other, they do not correlate well with human ratings. While the cloud-based services would be an extremely useful tool for human-agent interaction, their current quality does not justify their usage in human-agent conversations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

情感在人机交互中起着重要的作用。为了实现自然交互,智能体必须能够分析用户话语中的情感。现代代理使用分布式服务模型,其中它们的功能可以位于任意数量的计算机上,包括基于云的服务器。将语音识别和情绪分析外包给云服务,即使是简单的代理也能根据用户的情绪状态调整自己的行为。在这项研究中,我们测试情绪分析工具是否可以准确地衡量人类聊天机器人互动中的情绪。为此,我们比较了从基于云的情感分析服务的三个主要供应商(微软、亚马逊和谷歌)获得的情感分析的质量。此外,我们将他们的结果与领先的基于词典的软件以及人类评分进行比较。结果表明,尽管情感分析工具之间的一致性适度,但它们与人类评分的相关性并不好。虽然基于云的服务对于人机交互来说是一个非常有用的工具,但它们目前的质量并不能证明它们在人机对话中的使用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cloud-Based Sentiment Analysis for Interactive Agents
Emotions play an important role in human-agent interaction. To realise natural interaction it is essential for an agent to be able to analyse the sentiment in users' utterances. Modern agents use a distributed service model in which their functions can be located on any number of computers including cloud-based servers. Outsourcing the speech recognition and sentiment analysis to a cloud service enables even simple agents to adapt their behaviour to the emotional state of their users. In this study we test whether sentiment analysis tools can accurately gauge sentiment in human-chatbot interaction. To that effect, we compare the quality of sentiment analysis obtained from three major suppliers of cloud-based sentiment analysis services (Microsoft, Amazon and Google). In addition, we compare their results with the leading lexicon-based software, as well as with human ratings. The results show that although the sentiment analysis tools agree moderately with each other, they do not correlate well with human ratings. While the cloud-based services would be an extremely useful tool for human-agent interaction, their current quality does not justify their usage in human-agent conversations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信