综合科学、技术、工程、数学教育的教师技术教学内容知识

M. J. Nalipay, M. Jong, Thomas K. F. Chiu, C. Chai
{"title":"综合科学、技术、工程、数学教育的教师技术教学内容知识","authors":"M. J. Nalipay, M. Jong, Thomas K. F. Chiu, C. Chai","doi":"10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to validate a measure of teachers' self-efficacy in implementing integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education-the Technological Pedagogical STEM Knowledge Survey (TP-STEMK)-in a sample of 235 teachers in Hong Kong. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test TP-STEMK's measurement validity, while structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to examine the interrelationships among its factors. Results of the CFA showed that the four-factor model of TP-STEMK composed of self-efficacy for technological pedagogical mathematics knowledge (TPMK), technological pedagogical science knowledge (TPSK), technological pedagogical engineering knowledge (TPEK), and integrative STEM (iSTEM) has good fit to the data, providing support for its measurement validity. Moreover, results of the SEM revealed that TPMK, TPSK, and TPEK significantly and positively predicted iSTEM, with TPMK as the strongest predictor. Hence, the study was able to extend the validity of the TP-STEMK to a sample of teachers in Hong Kong.","PeriodicalId":365516,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Integrative Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Nalipay, M. Jong, Thomas K. F. Chiu, C. Chai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to validate a measure of teachers' self-efficacy in implementing integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education-the Technological Pedagogical STEM Knowledge Survey (TP-STEMK)-in a sample of 235 teachers in Hong Kong. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test TP-STEMK's measurement validity, while structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to examine the interrelationships among its factors. Results of the CFA showed that the four-factor model of TP-STEMK composed of self-efficacy for technological pedagogical mathematics knowledge (TPMK), technological pedagogical science knowledge (TPSK), technological pedagogical engineering knowledge (TPEK), and integrative STEM (iSTEM) has good fit to the data, providing support for its measurement validity. Moreover, results of the SEM revealed that TPMK, TPSK, and TPEK significantly and positively predicted iSTEM, with TPMK as the strongest predictor. Hence, the study was able to extend the validity of the TP-STEMK to a sample of teachers in Hong Kong.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在验证教师在实施综合科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育时的自我效能感-技术教学STEM知识调查(TP-STEMK)-在香港的235名教师的样本。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)检验TP-STEMK的测量效度,采用结构方程模型(SEM)检验其各因素之间的相互关系。CFA结果表明,由技术教学数学知识(TPMK)、技术教学科学知识(TPSK)、技术教学工程知识(TPEK)和综合STEM知识(iSTEM)组成的TP-STEMK四因素模型与数据拟合良好,为其测量效度提供了支持。此外,扫描电镜结果显示,TPMK、TPSK和TPEK显著正向预测系统,其中TPMK是最强的预测因子。因此,本研究能够将TP-STEMK的有效性扩展到香港教师样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Integrative Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
The study aimed to validate a measure of teachers' self-efficacy in implementing integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education-the Technological Pedagogical STEM Knowledge Survey (TP-STEMK)-in a sample of 235 teachers in Hong Kong. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test TP-STEMK's measurement validity, while structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to examine the interrelationships among its factors. Results of the CFA showed that the four-factor model of TP-STEMK composed of self-efficacy for technological pedagogical mathematics knowledge (TPMK), technological pedagogical science knowledge (TPSK), technological pedagogical engineering knowledge (TPEK), and integrative STEM (iSTEM) has good fit to the data, providing support for its measurement validity. Moreover, results of the SEM revealed that TPMK, TPSK, and TPEK significantly and positively predicted iSTEM, with TPMK as the strongest predictor. Hence, the study was able to extend the validity of the TP-STEMK to a sample of teachers in Hong Kong.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信