对Ahiakpor教授关于j.s.密尔、“工资基金”和产出需求的回应

Roy H. Grieve
{"title":"对Ahiakpor教授关于j.s.密尔、“工资基金”和产出需求的回应","authors":"Roy H. Grieve","doi":"10.1080/10370196.2020.1784651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ahiakpor takes both Kates and Grieve to task for what we say regarding J. S. Mill, the wages-fund doctrine, demand for commodities and Say’s Law. With respect to our alleged shortcomings, Ahiakpor observes, ‘Grieve believes he has shown the error of Say’s Law. Both Grieve and Kates are mistaken in their principal arguments.’ In this note I take up points raised by Ahiakpor against my views on these matters; I let Kates himself deal elsewhere with Ahiakpor’s other objections.","PeriodicalId":143586,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to Professor Ahiakpor, Concerning J. S. Mill, the ‘Wages-Fund’ and the Demand for Output\",\"authors\":\"Roy H. Grieve\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10370196.2020.1784651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Ahiakpor takes both Kates and Grieve to task for what we say regarding J. S. Mill, the wages-fund doctrine, demand for commodities and Say’s Law. With respect to our alleged shortcomings, Ahiakpor observes, ‘Grieve believes he has shown the error of Say’s Law. Both Grieve and Kates are mistaken in their principal arguments.’ In this note I take up points raised by Ahiakpor against my views on these matters; I let Kates himself deal elsewhere with Ahiakpor’s other objections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2020.1784651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2020.1784651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿希阿克波尔对我们所说的密尔、工资基金学说、商品需求和萨伊定律提出了质疑。关于我们所谓的缺点,Ahiakpor评论道,“格里夫认为他已经证明了萨伊定律的错误。格里夫和凯特的主要论点都是错误的。“在这篇文章中,我采纳了亚希亚波对我在这些问题上的看法提出的观点;我让凯特自己在别处处理亚希阿克波的其他反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Response to Professor Ahiakpor, Concerning J. S. Mill, the ‘Wages-Fund’ and the Demand for Output
Abstract Ahiakpor takes both Kates and Grieve to task for what we say regarding J. S. Mill, the wages-fund doctrine, demand for commodities and Say’s Law. With respect to our alleged shortcomings, Ahiakpor observes, ‘Grieve believes he has shown the error of Say’s Law. Both Grieve and Kates are mistaken in their principal arguments.’ In this note I take up points raised by Ahiakpor against my views on these matters; I let Kates himself deal elsewhere with Ahiakpor’s other objections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信