自动音乐播放列表生成中的偏差:下一首曲目推荐技术的比较

D. Jannach, Iman Kamehkhosh, Geoffray Bonnin
{"title":"自动音乐播放列表生成中的偏差:下一首曲目推荐技术的比较","authors":"D. Jannach, Iman Kamehkhosh, Geoffray Bonnin","doi":"10.1145/2930238.2930283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Playlist generation is a special form of music recommendation where the problem is to create a sequence of tracks to be played next, given a number of seed tracks. In academia, the evaluation of playlisting techniques is often done by assessing with the help of information retrieval measures if an algorithm is capable of selecting those tracks that also a human would pick next. Such approaches however cannot capture other factors, e.g., the homogeneity of the tracks that can determine the quality perception of playlists. In this work, we report the results of a multi-metric comparison of different academic approaches and a commercial playlisting service. Our results show that all tested techniques generate playlists with certain biases, e.g., towards very popular tracks, and often create playlists continuations that are quite different from those that are created by real users.","PeriodicalId":339100,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biases in Automated Music Playlist Generation: A Comparison of Next-Track Recommending Techniques\",\"authors\":\"D. Jannach, Iman Kamehkhosh, Geoffray Bonnin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2930238.2930283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Playlist generation is a special form of music recommendation where the problem is to create a sequence of tracks to be played next, given a number of seed tracks. In academia, the evaluation of playlisting techniques is often done by assessing with the help of information retrieval measures if an algorithm is capable of selecting those tracks that also a human would pick next. Such approaches however cannot capture other factors, e.g., the homogeneity of the tracks that can determine the quality perception of playlists. In this work, we report the results of a multi-metric comparison of different academic approaches and a commercial playlisting service. Our results show that all tested techniques generate playlists with certain biases, e.g., towards very popular tracks, and often create playlists continuations that are quite different from those that are created by real users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

播放列表生成是一种特殊形式的音乐推荐,其问题是在给定一些种子曲目的情况下创建接下来要播放的曲目序列。在学术界,对播放列表技术的评估通常是通过在信息检索措施的帮助下评估算法是否能够选择那些人类也会选择的曲目来完成的。然而,这种方法无法捕捉到其他因素,例如,可以决定播放列表质量感知的曲目的同质性。在这项工作中,我们报告了不同学术方法和商业播放列表服务的多指标比较结果。我们的结果表明,所有测试的技术生成的播放列表都有一定的偏差,例如,倾向于非常流行的曲目,并且经常创建与真实用户创建的播放列表有很大不同的播放列表延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biases in Automated Music Playlist Generation: A Comparison of Next-Track Recommending Techniques
Playlist generation is a special form of music recommendation where the problem is to create a sequence of tracks to be played next, given a number of seed tracks. In academia, the evaluation of playlisting techniques is often done by assessing with the help of information retrieval measures if an algorithm is capable of selecting those tracks that also a human would pick next. Such approaches however cannot capture other factors, e.g., the homogeneity of the tracks that can determine the quality perception of playlists. In this work, we report the results of a multi-metric comparison of different academic approaches and a commercial playlisting service. Our results show that all tested techniques generate playlists with certain biases, e.g., towards very popular tracks, and often create playlists continuations that are quite different from those that are created by real users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信