功能形式有多灵活?:衡量理论的限制性

D. Fudenberg, Wayne Yuan Gao, Annie Liang
{"title":"功能形式有多灵活?:衡量理论的限制性","authors":"D. Fudenberg, Wayne Yuan Gao, Annie Liang","doi":"10.1145/3465456.3467556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a new way to quantify the restrictiveness of an economic model, based on how well the model fits simulated, hypothetical data sets. The data sets are drawn at random from a distribution that satisfies some application-dependent content restrictions (such as that people prefer more money to less). Models that can fit almost all hypothetical data well are not restrictive. To illustrate our approach, we evaluate the restrictiveness of popular behavioral models in two experimental settings---certainty equivalents and initial play---and explain how restrictiveness reveals new insights about each of the models.","PeriodicalId":395676,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Flexible is that Functional Form?: Measuring the Restrictiveness of Theories\",\"authors\":\"D. Fudenberg, Wayne Yuan Gao, Annie Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3465456.3467556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a new way to quantify the restrictiveness of an economic model, based on how well the model fits simulated, hypothetical data sets. The data sets are drawn at random from a distribution that satisfies some application-dependent content restrictions (such as that people prefer more money to less). Models that can fit almost all hypothetical data well are not restrictive. To illustrate our approach, we evaluate the restrictiveness of popular behavioral models in two experimental settings---certainty equivalents and initial play---and explain how restrictiveness reveals new insights about each of the models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465456.3467556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465456.3467556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了一种新的方法来量化经济模型的限制性,基于模型对模拟的假设数据集的拟合程度。数据集是从满足某些与应用程序相关的内容限制的分布中随机抽取的(例如,人们更喜欢钱多而不是钱少)。可以很好地拟合几乎所有假设数据的模型不是限制性的。为了说明我们的方法,我们在两个实验环境中评估了流行行为模型的限制性——确定性等同和初始游戏——并解释了限制性如何揭示每个模型的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Flexible is that Functional Form?: Measuring the Restrictiveness of Theories
We propose a new way to quantify the restrictiveness of an economic model, based on how well the model fits simulated, hypothetical data sets. The data sets are drawn at random from a distribution that satisfies some application-dependent content restrictions (such as that people prefer more money to less). Models that can fit almost all hypothetical data well are not restrictive. To illustrate our approach, we evaluate the restrictiveness of popular behavioral models in two experimental settings---certainty equivalents and initial play---and explain how restrictiveness reveals new insights about each of the models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信