FERC诉EPSA:功能主义和未来的电力工业

M. Christiansen
{"title":"FERC诉EPSA:功能主义和未来的电力工业","authors":"M. Christiansen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2728764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Essay addresses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The decision has received a level of popular attention that is almost unprecedented for a case involving electricity regulation. Nevertheless, one of the decision’s most jurisprudentially significant aspects has gone largely unnoticed. In ruling for FERC, the Court adopted a deeply functionalist approach to the Federal Power Act’s division of jurisdiction between state and federal regulators. In so doing, the Court cited with approval a number of pragmatic steps that FERC took to manage the jurisdictional challenges posed by new technologies for generating and consuming electricity. This is a laudable development. As the Essay explains, this functionalist approach will empower FERC to adapt the FPA to meet these new challenges while nevertheless remaining consistent with the FPA’s overarching purpose.","PeriodicalId":280037,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FERC v. EPSA: Functionalism and the Electricity Industry of the Future\",\"authors\":\"M. Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2728764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Essay addresses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The decision has received a level of popular attention that is almost unprecedented for a case involving electricity regulation. Nevertheless, one of the decision’s most jurisprudentially significant aspects has gone largely unnoticed. In ruling for FERC, the Court adopted a deeply functionalist approach to the Federal Power Act’s division of jurisdiction between state and federal regulators. In so doing, the Court cited with approval a number of pragmatic steps that FERC took to manage the jurisdictional challenges posed by new technologies for generating and consuming electricity. This is a laudable development. As the Essay explains, this functionalist approach will empower FERC to adapt the FPA to meet these new challenges while nevertheless remaining consistent with the FPA’s overarching purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文论述了最高法院最近在联邦能源管理委员会诉电力供应协会案中的判决。这一决定受到了广泛关注,这在涉及电力监管的案件中几乎是前所未有的。然而,该判决在法理学上最重要的一个方面却基本上被忽视了。在对联邦电力管理委员会的裁决中,法院对《联邦电力法》在州和联邦监管机构之间的管辖权划分采用了一种深刻的功能主义方法。在此过程中,法院以赞同的态度引用了FERC为管理发电和用电新技术带来的管辖权挑战而采取的一些务实步骤。这是一个值得称赞的发展。正如文章所解释的那样,这种功能主义的方法将使FERC能够调整FPA以应对这些新的挑战,同时保持与FPA总体目标的一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FERC v. EPSA: Functionalism and the Electricity Industry of the Future
This Essay addresses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The decision has received a level of popular attention that is almost unprecedented for a case involving electricity regulation. Nevertheless, one of the decision’s most jurisprudentially significant aspects has gone largely unnoticed. In ruling for FERC, the Court adopted a deeply functionalist approach to the Federal Power Act’s division of jurisdiction between state and federal regulators. In so doing, the Court cited with approval a number of pragmatic steps that FERC took to manage the jurisdictional challenges posed by new technologies for generating and consuming electricity. This is a laudable development. As the Essay explains, this functionalist approach will empower FERC to adapt the FPA to meet these new challenges while nevertheless remaining consistent with the FPA’s overarching purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信