公共权力机构的责任:一个经济学分析

De Mot Jef, M. Faure
{"title":"公共权力机构的责任:一个经济学分析","authors":"De Mot Jef, M. Faure","doi":"10.1017/9781780685595.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional economic analysis of accident law has largely focused on individual utility maximising actors as potential injurers and victims. On that basis a huge literature has been developed since the early publications of Calabresi in the 1960's explaining under which conditions particular liability rules may be effective in promoting social welfare. Moreover, the theoretical assumptions made in the literature have increasingly been met with empirical support. However, less attention has been paid to the situation where the tortfeasor is not an individual actor or a commercial enterprise, but rather a public authority. Only relatively recently have some articles started to explore public authority liability. The goal of our contribution is to provide an overview of this literature.","PeriodicalId":410319,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Liability of Public Authorities: An Economic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"De Mot Jef, M. Faure\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781780685595.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional economic analysis of accident law has largely focused on individual utility maximising actors as potential injurers and victims. On that basis a huge literature has been developed since the early publications of Calabresi in the 1960's explaining under which conditions particular liability rules may be effective in promoting social welfare. Moreover, the theoretical assumptions made in the literature have increasingly been met with empirical support. However, less attention has been paid to the situation where the tortfeasor is not an individual actor or a commercial enterprise, but rather a public authority. Only relatively recently have some articles started to explore public authority liability. The goal of our contribution is to provide an overview of this literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685595.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685595.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的事故法经济分析主要集中在个体效用最大化行为者作为潜在的伤害者和受害者。在此基础上,自20世纪60年代卡拉布雷西的早期出版物以来,已经发展了大量的文献,解释在哪些条件下特定的责任规则可以有效地促进社会福利。此外,文献中提出的理论假设越来越多地得到了实证支持。然而,对于侵权行为人不是个体行为人或商业企业,而是公共权力机构的情况,关注较少。直到最近才有一些文章开始探讨公共权力机构的责任。我们贡献的目标是提供这一文献的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Liability of Public Authorities: An Economic Analysis
Traditional economic analysis of accident law has largely focused on individual utility maximising actors as potential injurers and victims. On that basis a huge literature has been developed since the early publications of Calabresi in the 1960's explaining under which conditions particular liability rules may be effective in promoting social welfare. Moreover, the theoretical assumptions made in the literature have increasingly been met with empirical support. However, less attention has been paid to the situation where the tortfeasor is not an individual actor or a commercial enterprise, but rather a public authority. Only relatively recently have some articles started to explore public authority liability. The goal of our contribution is to provide an overview of this literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信