安那那的肉体科学:走向非洲悲观主义的科学理论

J. Gillespie
{"title":"安那那的肉体科学:走向非洲悲观主义的科学理论","authors":"J. Gillespie","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay re-examines the life of the three enslaved Black “women” Anarcha, Lucy and Betsy at the hands of the acclaimed “Father of Modern Gynecology” J. Marion Sims through the lens of Afropessimism as a means of developing a new analytics of seeing modern scientific development. Through a critical Black studies engagement with the work of Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, the paper sets out to explain and expand the concept of ‘primitive accreditation’ as it relates to the foundational narratives and performances of violence constitutive of the modern scientific conceptual economy. Through paradigmatic analysis, the essay aims to antagonize the ease in which anti-Blackness coheres bio-centric notions of gender, sexuality, and humanity as well as suggest that science studies as a field has not yet wrestled with the gender/genre question of Blackness as a problem for the axioms of thought and being.","PeriodicalId":316008,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anarcha’s Science of the Flesh: Towards an Afropessimist Theory of Science\",\"authors\":\"J. Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay re-examines the life of the three enslaved Black “women” Anarcha, Lucy and Betsy at the hands of the acclaimed “Father of Modern Gynecology” J. Marion Sims through the lens of Afropessimism as a means of developing a new analytics of seeing modern scientific development. Through a critical Black studies engagement with the work of Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, the paper sets out to explain and expand the concept of ‘primitive accreditation’ as it relates to the foundational narratives and performances of violence constitutive of the modern scientific conceptual economy. Through paradigmatic analysis, the essay aims to antagonize the ease in which anti-Blackness coheres bio-centric notions of gender, sexuality, and humanity as well as suggest that science studies as a field has not yet wrestled with the gender/genre question of Blackness as a problem for the axioms of thought and being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过非洲悲观主义的视角,重新审视了“现代妇科之父”马里昂·西姆斯(J. Marion Sims)手中三个被奴役的黑人“女性”安那卡、露西和贝特西的生活,并以此作为一种看待现代科学发展的新分析方法。通过对布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)和史蒂夫·伍尔加(Steve Woolgar)的作品进行批判性的黑人研究,本文开始解释和扩展“原始认可”的概念,因为它与构成现代科学概念经济的暴力的基本叙述和表现有关。通过范式分析,本文旨在对抗反黑性将性别、性和人性等生物中心概念凝聚在一起的轻松,并表明科学研究作为一个领域尚未将黑性的性别/类型问题作为思想和存在公理的问题进行斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anarcha’s Science of the Flesh: Towards an Afropessimist Theory of Science
This essay re-examines the life of the three enslaved Black “women” Anarcha, Lucy and Betsy at the hands of the acclaimed “Father of Modern Gynecology” J. Marion Sims through the lens of Afropessimism as a means of developing a new analytics of seeing modern scientific development. Through a critical Black studies engagement with the work of Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, the paper sets out to explain and expand the concept of ‘primitive accreditation’ as it relates to the foundational narratives and performances of violence constitutive of the modern scientific conceptual economy. Through paradigmatic analysis, the essay aims to antagonize the ease in which anti-Blackness coheres bio-centric notions of gender, sexuality, and humanity as well as suggest that science studies as a field has not yet wrestled with the gender/genre question of Blackness as a problem for the axioms of thought and being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信