OO是否如它所承诺的那样工作?

S. Han
{"title":"OO是否如它所承诺的那样工作?","authors":"S. Han","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To discuss whether or not the OO (object-oriented) paradigm for software development is working as it promised, we review what the OO software development paradigm promised. Users in different communities introduced different advantages of using OO for different applications. The OO concepts are well suited to problems using real world concepts rather than computer concepts. This means that OO can give better understanding of requirements for the target software applications we want to develop. The better understanding of requirements can give rise to a cleaner analysis of problems and a cleaner design to solve those problems. Operator polymorphism as one important feature of the OO paradigm provides easier software maintenance. The caller of an operation of a class need not be concerned about how many implementations of a given operation exist and need not be modified when a class is added. The OO paradigm also provides an environment in which designs and code are reusable on future projects, because its features such as abstraction, encapsulation, and inheritance, enable libraries of reusable components to be built. Reusability can make us able to reduce the code size and the software development time. We look at what the real problems of using the OO development paradigm are in a practical sense. People in the OO community, especially OO gurus, have shown that OO technology has several benefits in software development. However, they haven't shows how difficult a sudden transition from one technique to another was, especially in business organisations.","PeriodicalId":306601,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is OO working as it promised?\",\"authors\":\"S. Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To discuss whether or not the OO (object-oriented) paradigm for software development is working as it promised, we review what the OO software development paradigm promised. Users in different communities introduced different advantages of using OO for different applications. The OO concepts are well suited to problems using real world concepts rather than computer concepts. This means that OO can give better understanding of requirements for the target software applications we want to develop. The better understanding of requirements can give rise to a cleaner analysis of problems and a cleaner design to solve those problems. Operator polymorphism as one important feature of the OO paradigm provides easier software maintenance. The caller of an operation of a class need not be concerned about how many implementations of a given operation exist and need not be modified when a class is added. The OO paradigm also provides an environment in which designs and code are reusable on future projects, because its features such as abstraction, encapsulation, and inheritance, enable libraries of reusable components to be built. Reusability can make us able to reduce the code size and the software development time. We look at what the real problems of using the OO development paradigm are in a practical sense. People in the OO community, especially OO gurus, have shown that OO technology has several benefits in software development. However, they haven't shows how difficult a sudden transition from one technique to another was, especially in business organisations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 20th International Computer Software and Applications Conference: COMPSAC '96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1996.544154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了讨论OO(面向对象)软件开发范式是否如它所承诺的那样工作,我们回顾了OO软件开发范式所承诺的内容。不同社区的用户介绍了针对不同应用程序使用OO的不同优势。OO概念非常适合使用现实世界的概念而不是计算机概念来解决问题。这意味着OO可以更好地理解我们想要开发的目标软件应用程序的需求。对需求的更好理解可以产生更清晰的问题分析和更清晰的设计来解决这些问题。操作符多态性作为OO范式的一个重要特性,提供了更容易的软件维护。类操作的调用者不需要关心给定操作存在多少个实现,也不需要在添加类时进行修改。OO范型还提供了一种环境,在这种环境中,设计和代码可以在未来的项目中重用,因为它的一些特性(如抽象、封装和继承)支持构建可重用组件库。可重用性使我们能够减少代码大小和软件开发时间。我们着眼于在实际意义上使用OO开发范式的真正问题是什么。OO社区的人们,尤其是OO大师,已经证明OO技术在软件开发中有几个好处。然而,他们并没有显示出从一种技术突然过渡到另一种技术有多么困难,尤其是在商业组织中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is OO working as it promised?
To discuss whether or not the OO (object-oriented) paradigm for software development is working as it promised, we review what the OO software development paradigm promised. Users in different communities introduced different advantages of using OO for different applications. The OO concepts are well suited to problems using real world concepts rather than computer concepts. This means that OO can give better understanding of requirements for the target software applications we want to develop. The better understanding of requirements can give rise to a cleaner analysis of problems and a cleaner design to solve those problems. Operator polymorphism as one important feature of the OO paradigm provides easier software maintenance. The caller of an operation of a class need not be concerned about how many implementations of a given operation exist and need not be modified when a class is added. The OO paradigm also provides an environment in which designs and code are reusable on future projects, because its features such as abstraction, encapsulation, and inheritance, enable libraries of reusable components to be built. Reusability can make us able to reduce the code size and the software development time. We look at what the real problems of using the OO development paradigm are in a practical sense. People in the OO community, especially OO gurus, have shown that OO technology has several benefits in software development. However, they haven't shows how difficult a sudden transition from one technique to another was, especially in business organisations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信