社会网络中知识共享的相互选择

J.D. Wang, T. H. Yim-Teo, K. Yeo
{"title":"社会网络中知识共享的相互选择","authors":"J.D. Wang, T. H. Yim-Teo, K. Yeo","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing secondary data, this paper analyzes the mutual-choice social networks for single-loop and double-loop knowledge benefits. Two interesting results are presented. First, we observe that mutual-choice social networks show obvious cluster phenomenon, which are different from one-sided relations shown in original graphs. Mutual-choice relationships require bilateral content of two involved agents; therefore similarity (e.g. the period in the firm) between members partly increases the likelihood of forming the links within the groups. A second finding presents that the amount of mutual-choice networks reduces sharply when knowledge benefits develop from single-loop to double-loop level. High requirements of maintaining relationships for double-loop benefits may limit the quantity, but improve the quality of links. The research contributes to theory on knowledge management and social network analysis by investigating symmetric dyadic relationships of knowledge sharing","PeriodicalId":412957,"journal":{"name":"2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual choices of knowledge sharing in social networks\",\"authors\":\"J.D. Wang, T. H. Yim-Teo, K. Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Utilizing secondary data, this paper analyzes the mutual-choice social networks for single-loop and double-loop knowledge benefits. Two interesting results are presented. First, we observe that mutual-choice social networks show obvious cluster phenomenon, which are different from one-sided relations shown in original graphs. Mutual-choice relationships require bilateral content of two involved agents; therefore similarity (e.g. the period in the firm) between members partly increases the likelihood of forming the links within the groups. A second finding presents that the amount of mutual-choice networks reduces sharply when knowledge benefits develop from single-loop to double-loop level. High requirements of maintaining relationships for double-loop benefits may limit the quantity, but improve the quality of links. The research contributes to theory on knowledge management and social network analysis by investigating symmetric dyadic relationships of knowledge sharing\",\"PeriodicalId\":412957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

利用二手数据,分析了单环和双环知识效益的相互选择社会网络。提出了两个有趣的结果。首先,我们观察到相互选择的社会网络表现出明显的聚类现象,这与原始图中显示的片面关系不同。相互选择关系要求两个参与主体的双边内容;因此,成员之间的相似性(如在公司的时间)在一定程度上增加了群体内部形成联系的可能性。第二个发现表明,当知识收益从单环发展到双环水平时,相互选择网络的数量急剧减少。双环利益对维持关系的高要求可能会限制链接的数量,但会提高链接的质量。通过研究知识共享的对称二矢关系,为知识管理和社会网络分析提供理论依据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutual choices of knowledge sharing in social networks
Utilizing secondary data, this paper analyzes the mutual-choice social networks for single-loop and double-loop knowledge benefits. Two interesting results are presented. First, we observe that mutual-choice social networks show obvious cluster phenomenon, which are different from one-sided relations shown in original graphs. Mutual-choice relationships require bilateral content of two involved agents; therefore similarity (e.g. the period in the firm) between members partly increases the likelihood of forming the links within the groups. A second finding presents that the amount of mutual-choice networks reduces sharply when knowledge benefits develop from single-loop to double-loop level. High requirements of maintaining relationships for double-loop benefits may limit the quantity, but improve the quality of links. The research contributes to theory on knowledge management and social network analysis by investigating symmetric dyadic relationships of knowledge sharing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信