测量麻醉深度的脑电图分形维数

E. Negahbani, R. Amirfattahi, B. Ahmadi
{"title":"测量麻醉深度的脑电图分形维数","authors":"E. Negahbani, R. Amirfattahi, B. Ahmadi","doi":"10.1109/ICTTA.2008.4530055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a combined method including adaptive segmentation and Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD) of electroencephalograms (EEG) to monitor depth of anesthesia (DOA). The EEG data was captured in both ICU and operating room and different anesthetic drugs, including propofol and isoflurane were used. Due to the non- stationary nature of EEG signal, adaptive segmentation methods seem to have better results. The HFD of a single channel EEG was computed through adaptive windowing methods consist of adaptive variance and auto correlation function (ACF) based methods. We have compared the results of fixed and adaptive windowing in different methods of calculating HFD in order to estimate DOA. Prediction probability (P^) was used as a measure of correlation between the predictors and BIS index to evaluate our proposed methods. The results show that HFD increases with increasing BIS index. In ICU, all of the methods reveal better performance than in other groups. In both ICU and operating room, the results indicate no obvious superiority in calculating HFD through adaptive segmentation.","PeriodicalId":330215,"journal":{"name":"2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroencephalogram Fractral Dimension as a Measure of Depth of Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"E. Negahbani, R. Amirfattahi, B. Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTTA.2008.4530055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a combined method including adaptive segmentation and Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD) of electroencephalograms (EEG) to monitor depth of anesthesia (DOA). The EEG data was captured in both ICU and operating room and different anesthetic drugs, including propofol and isoflurane were used. Due to the non- stationary nature of EEG signal, adaptive segmentation methods seem to have better results. The HFD of a single channel EEG was computed through adaptive windowing methods consist of adaptive variance and auto correlation function (ACF) based methods. We have compared the results of fixed and adaptive windowing in different methods of calculating HFD in order to estimate DOA. Prediction probability (P^) was used as a measure of correlation between the predictors and BIS index to evaluate our proposed methods. The results show that HFD increases with increasing BIS index. In ICU, all of the methods reveal better performance than in other groups. In both ICU and operating room, the results indicate no obvious superiority in calculating HFD through adaptive segmentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTTA.2008.4530055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTTA.2008.4530055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

提出了一种结合脑电自适应分割和Higuchi分形维数(HFD)的麻醉深度监测方法。分别在ICU和手术室采集脑电图数据,并使用异丙酚和异氟醚等麻醉药物。由于脑电信号的非平稳性,自适应分割方法似乎具有较好的效果。采用基于自适应方差和自相关函数(ACF)的自适应加窗方法计算单通道脑电信号的HFD。为了估计DOA,我们比较了固定窗和自适应窗在计算HFD的不同方法中的结果。预测概率(P^)作为预测因子与BIS指数之间相关性的度量来评估我们提出的方法。结果表明,HFD随BIS指数的增加而增加。在ICU中,所有方法的效果均优于其他组。在ICU和手术室中,结果显示自适应分割计算HFD没有明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electroencephalogram Fractral Dimension as a Measure of Depth of Anesthesia
This paper proposes a combined method including adaptive segmentation and Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD) of electroencephalograms (EEG) to monitor depth of anesthesia (DOA). The EEG data was captured in both ICU and operating room and different anesthetic drugs, including propofol and isoflurane were used. Due to the non- stationary nature of EEG signal, adaptive segmentation methods seem to have better results. The HFD of a single channel EEG was computed through adaptive windowing methods consist of adaptive variance and auto correlation function (ACF) based methods. We have compared the results of fixed and adaptive windowing in different methods of calculating HFD in order to estimate DOA. Prediction probability (P^) was used as a measure of correlation between the predictors and BIS index to evaluate our proposed methods. The results show that HFD increases with increasing BIS index. In ICU, all of the methods reveal better performance than in other groups. In both ICU and operating room, the results indicate no obvious superiority in calculating HFD through adaptive segmentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信