机械工程专业毕业成功与myers-briggs气质指标的关系

R. Bannerot
{"title":"机械工程专业毕业成功与myers-briggs气质指标的关系","authors":"R. Bannerot","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distributions of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators, Preferences, and Temperaments for entering and graduating BSME students and the mechanical engineering faculty at the University of Houston are presented and compared. Based on long-term averages, the S-, T-, J-, SJ-, ESTJ- and ISTJ- preferring individuals appear to have some positive correlation with success in our mechanical engineering program. For example, individuals preferring “sensation” over “intuition”, “thinking” over “feeling”, and “judging over “perceiving”, (Myers-Briggs Preferences, S over N, T over F, and J over P, respectively) are about 50% more likely to graduate as those who prefer the opposite. A seven-year longitudinal study produced “entering” and “graduating” Myers-Briggs data for 118 students. A detailed analysis of this data determined that there was about a ten per cent net increase in individual E-, S-, T- and J-preferences which was the result of about a 15% actual change toward E-, S-, T-, and J-preferences and a 5% actual change toward I-, N-, F-, and P-preferences. Finally, the shift of the distribution of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators from the entering to the graduating students is seen to be moving toward the distribution exhibited by the faculty.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graduation success as a function of myers-briggs temperament indicators in mechanical engineering\",\"authors\":\"R. Bannerot\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The distributions of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators, Preferences, and Temperaments for entering and graduating BSME students and the mechanical engineering faculty at the University of Houston are presented and compared. Based on long-term averages, the S-, T-, J-, SJ-, ESTJ- and ISTJ- preferring individuals appear to have some positive correlation with success in our mechanical engineering program. For example, individuals preferring “sensation” over “intuition”, “thinking” over “feeling”, and “judging over “perceiving”, (Myers-Briggs Preferences, S over N, T over F, and J over P, respectively) are about 50% more likely to graduate as those who prefer the opposite. A seven-year longitudinal study produced “entering” and “graduating” Myers-Briggs data for 118 students. A detailed analysis of this data determined that there was about a ten per cent net increase in individual E-, S-, T- and J-preferences which was the result of about a 15% actual change toward E-, S-, T-, and J-preferences and a 5% actual change toward I-, N-, F-, and P-preferences. Finally, the shift of the distribution of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators from the entering to the graduating students is seen to be moving toward the distribution exhibited by the faculty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍并比较了休斯敦大学机械工程专业学生和BSME新生和毕业生的Myers-Briggs类型指标、偏好和气质的分布。基于长期平均值,S-, T-, J-, SJ-, ESTJ-和ISTJ-偏好的个体似乎与我们机械工程项目的成功有一定的正相关。例如,偏爱“感觉”胜过“直觉”,偏爱“思考”胜过“感觉”,偏爱“判断”胜过“感知”(迈尔斯-布里格斯偏好,分别是S胜过N, T胜过F, J胜过P)的人毕业的可能性比偏爱相反偏好的人高出50%左右。一项为期7年的纵向研究为118名学生提供了“入学”和“毕业”的迈尔斯-布里格斯数据。对这些数据的详细分析表明,E-、S-、T-和j偏好的个体净增长约为10%,这是E-、S-、T-和j偏好的实际变化约为15%,I-、N-、F-和p偏好的实际变化约为5%的结果。最后,迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标的分布从入学到毕业的学生向教师展示的分布转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graduation success as a function of myers-briggs temperament indicators in mechanical engineering
The distributions of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators, Preferences, and Temperaments for entering and graduating BSME students and the mechanical engineering faculty at the University of Houston are presented and compared. Based on long-term averages, the S-, T-, J-, SJ-, ESTJ- and ISTJ- preferring individuals appear to have some positive correlation with success in our mechanical engineering program. For example, individuals preferring “sensation” over “intuition”, “thinking” over “feeling”, and “judging over “perceiving”, (Myers-Briggs Preferences, S over N, T over F, and J over P, respectively) are about 50% more likely to graduate as those who prefer the opposite. A seven-year longitudinal study produced “entering” and “graduating” Myers-Briggs data for 118 students. A detailed analysis of this data determined that there was about a ten per cent net increase in individual E-, S-, T- and J-preferences which was the result of about a 15% actual change toward E-, S-, T-, and J-preferences and a 5% actual change toward I-, N-, F-, and P-preferences. Finally, the shift of the distribution of Myers-Briggs Type Indicators from the entering to the graduating students is seen to be moving toward the distribution exhibited by the faculty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信