L. Grīnberga
{"title":"Macrophyte Species Composition in Streams of Latvia under Different Flow and Substrate conditions/Makrofuutide Liigiline Koosseis Lati Vooluvetes Erineva Voolukiiruse Ja Substraadi Tingimustes","authors":"L. Grīnberga","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2011.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Streams are heterogeneous environments with differences in physical and chemical parameters. Different studies worldwide obviously indicate that the knowledge of the macrophyte species composition and abundance provides important information on the aquatic ecosystem (e.g., Best, 1995; Dawson & Szoszkiewicz, 1999; Baatrup-Pedersen et al., 2003). Macrophytes are a key component in the functioning of streams where they grow in relatively high abundance (Clarke, 2002). The physical stream environment has a major impact upon the development and growth of submersed macrophytes (Baatrup-Pedersen & Riis, 1999). In shallow, low-energy streams where macrophytes are able to grow abundantly, plants greatly influence the functioning of the ecosystem (Sand-Jensen et al., 1989). Substrate and flow velocity are the two most important factors influencing the distribution of macrophytes in streams. And vice versa, the growth of macrophytes has important impacts upon flow resistance, flow velocities, and sediment dynamics. Macrophytes grow abundatly under such current velocity and in sediments where they can be best rooted and withstand the erosive force of the water during periodic scour events (Chambers et al., 1991). Velocity is an important controlling factor of substrate stability and composition of macrophytes. Several researchers have argued that flow velocity is the main factor in controlling macrophyte composition and biomass in streams (Westlake, 1967; Nilsson, 1987; Chambers et al., 1991; Riis & Biggs, 2003; Haslam, 2006). Flow velocity has often been found to affect the distribution of macrophytes in streams (e.g., Riis et al., 2000; Demars & Harper, 2005). River surveys have indicated that many macrophyte species are associated with sediment of particular particle size (Holmes, 1983; Haslam, 2006). Substrate stability is a significant controlling factor because a stable substrate allows rooting and establishment of macrophyte communities. Mobile substrates prevent this, resulting in a limited potential for plant community development (Riis & Biggs, 2003; Haslam, 2006). Despite the apparent importance of water movement in regulating macrophyte communities in lowland rivers, the nature of the processes and the factors controlling their dynamics are not well understood (Franklin et al., 2008). For an assessment of the ecological status of a stream using macrophytes a certain minimum plant quantity is required. The variability of macrophyte richness is linked to physical factors in the environment, which make an important contribution to the pattern of macrophyte distribution (Abou-Hamdan et al., 2005). Since there are still numerous unaffected streams in Latvia, knowledge of the riverine vegetation in Latvia could be of regional importance on a European scale; for example, Baatrup-Pedersen et al. (2008) found a high similarity of species-based predictions in Denmark before intensive land use started there around 1900 with vegetation in Latvian and Lithuanian streams. The aim of the study was to examine the role of different environmental factors in the formation of macrophyte vegetation in middle-sized lowland streams in Latvia, focusing on the importance of flow velocity and substrate type of streams. The objectives were to investigate the macrophyte vegetation at 131 stream sites throughout the country, and to supplement each survey with a description of environmental factors (substrate type, flow velocity, shading, stream width, and water depth). MATERIAL AND METHODS Study area The study area covers the whole territory of Latvia. There is a dense network of streams in Latvia. The total number of streams is up to 12 500, of which only 17 exceed 100 km (Klavins et al., 1999). The streams are classified as lowland streams with averagely low flow velocities and modest hydrological variability. However, spring flow velocities may be high and summer velocities low. …","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2011.3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

流是一种异构环境,具有不同的物理和化学参数。世界范围内不同的研究明显表明,对大型植物物种组成和丰度的了解提供了水生生态系统的重要信息(例如,Best, 1995;Dawson & Szoszkiewicz, 1999;baatrupp - pedersen et al., 2003)。大型植物是河流功能的关键组成部分,它们的生长数量相对较高(Clarke, 2002)。水体物理环境对水下大型植物的发育和生长有重要影响(baatrupp - pedersen & Riis, 1999)。在大型植物能够大量生长的浅水、低能量溪流中,植物极大地影响了生态系统的功能(Sand-Jensen et al., 1989)。基质和流速是影响河流中大型植物分布的两个最重要因素。反之,大型植物的生长对水流阻力、流速和泥沙动力学都有重要影响。在这样的流速下,大型植物在沉积物中大量生长,在那里它们可以最好地扎根,并在周期性冲刷事件中承受水的侵蚀力(Chambers et al., 1991)。流速是影响底物稳定性和植物组成的重要控制因素。一些研究人员认为流速是控制河流中大型植物组成和生物量的主要因素(Westlake, 1967;尼尔森,1987;Chambers et al., 1991;Riis & Biggs, 2003;海斯蓝,2006)。人们经常发现水流速度会影响河流中大型植物的分布(例如,Riis等人,2000;Demars & Harper, 2005)。河流调查表明,许多大型植物种类与特定粒度的沉积物有关(Holmes, 1983;海斯蓝,2006)。基质稳定性是一个重要的控制因素,因为稳定的基质有利于生根和建立大型植物群落。移动基质阻止了这一点,导致植物群落发展的潜力有限(Riis & Biggs, 2003;海斯蓝,2006)。尽管水运动在调节低地河流中大型植物群落方面具有明显的重要性,但人们对这一过程的性质和控制其动态的因素还不是很了解(Franklin et al., 2008)。为了利用大型植物对河流的生态状况进行评估,需要一定的最低植物数量。大型植物丰富度的变化与环境中的物理因素有关,这些因素对大型植物的分布格局有重要贡献(abu - hamdan et al., 2005)。由于拉脱维亚仍有许多未受影响的溪流,对拉脱维亚河流植被的了解在欧洲范围内可能具有区域重要性;例如,baatrupp - pedersen等人(2008)发现,在丹麦1900年左右开始集约土地利用之前,基于物种的预测与拉脱维亚和立陶宛溪流的植被高度相似。该研究的目的是研究拉脱维亚中型低地河流中不同环境因素在大型植物植被形成中的作用,重点关注水流速度和河流基质类型的重要性。目的是调查全国131个河流站点的大型植物植被,并通过对环境因素(基质类型、流速、遮阳、河流宽度和水深)的描述来补充每项调查。材料和方法研究区域研究区域覆盖拉脱维亚全境。拉脱维亚有一个密集的溪流网。河流总数达12500条,其中超过100公里的只有17条(Klavins et al., 1999)。这些河流被归类为平均流速低、水文变异性适中的低地河流。然而,春季流速可能很高,夏季流速可能很低。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macrophyte Species Composition in Streams of Latvia under Different Flow and Substrate conditions/Makrofuutide Liigiline Koosseis Lati Vooluvetes Erineva Voolukiiruse Ja Substraadi Tingimustes
INTRODUCTION Streams are heterogeneous environments with differences in physical and chemical parameters. Different studies worldwide obviously indicate that the knowledge of the macrophyte species composition and abundance provides important information on the aquatic ecosystem (e.g., Best, 1995; Dawson & Szoszkiewicz, 1999; Baatrup-Pedersen et al., 2003). Macrophytes are a key component in the functioning of streams where they grow in relatively high abundance (Clarke, 2002). The physical stream environment has a major impact upon the development and growth of submersed macrophytes (Baatrup-Pedersen & Riis, 1999). In shallow, low-energy streams where macrophytes are able to grow abundantly, plants greatly influence the functioning of the ecosystem (Sand-Jensen et al., 1989). Substrate and flow velocity are the two most important factors influencing the distribution of macrophytes in streams. And vice versa, the growth of macrophytes has important impacts upon flow resistance, flow velocities, and sediment dynamics. Macrophytes grow abundatly under such current velocity and in sediments where they can be best rooted and withstand the erosive force of the water during periodic scour events (Chambers et al., 1991). Velocity is an important controlling factor of substrate stability and composition of macrophytes. Several researchers have argued that flow velocity is the main factor in controlling macrophyte composition and biomass in streams (Westlake, 1967; Nilsson, 1987; Chambers et al., 1991; Riis & Biggs, 2003; Haslam, 2006). Flow velocity has often been found to affect the distribution of macrophytes in streams (e.g., Riis et al., 2000; Demars & Harper, 2005). River surveys have indicated that many macrophyte species are associated with sediment of particular particle size (Holmes, 1983; Haslam, 2006). Substrate stability is a significant controlling factor because a stable substrate allows rooting and establishment of macrophyte communities. Mobile substrates prevent this, resulting in a limited potential for plant community development (Riis & Biggs, 2003; Haslam, 2006). Despite the apparent importance of water movement in regulating macrophyte communities in lowland rivers, the nature of the processes and the factors controlling their dynamics are not well understood (Franklin et al., 2008). For an assessment of the ecological status of a stream using macrophytes a certain minimum plant quantity is required. The variability of macrophyte richness is linked to physical factors in the environment, which make an important contribution to the pattern of macrophyte distribution (Abou-Hamdan et al., 2005). Since there are still numerous unaffected streams in Latvia, knowledge of the riverine vegetation in Latvia could be of regional importance on a European scale; for example, Baatrup-Pedersen et al. (2008) found a high similarity of species-based predictions in Denmark before intensive land use started there around 1900 with vegetation in Latvian and Lithuanian streams. The aim of the study was to examine the role of different environmental factors in the formation of macrophyte vegetation in middle-sized lowland streams in Latvia, focusing on the importance of flow velocity and substrate type of streams. The objectives were to investigate the macrophyte vegetation at 131 stream sites throughout the country, and to supplement each survey with a description of environmental factors (substrate type, flow velocity, shading, stream width, and water depth). MATERIAL AND METHODS Study area The study area covers the whole territory of Latvia. There is a dense network of streams in Latvia. The total number of streams is up to 12 500, of which only 17 exceed 100 km (Klavins et al., 1999). The streams are classified as lowland streams with averagely low flow velocities and modest hydrological variability. However, spring flow velocities may be high and summer velocities low. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信