求解优化问题的改进正弦余弦算法

M. H. Suid, M. Ahmad, M. Ismail, M. R. Ghazali, A. Irawan, M. Tumari
{"title":"求解优化问题的改进正弦余弦算法","authors":"M. H. Suid, M. Ahmad, M. Ismail, M. R. Ghazali, A. Irawan, M. Tumari","doi":"10.1109/SPC.2018.8703982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to its simplicity and less tedious parameter tuning over other multi-agent-based optimization algorithms, Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) has gotten lots of attention from numerous researchers for resolving optimization problem. However, the existing SCA tends to have low optimization precision and local minima trapping effect due to the constraint in its exploration and exploitation mechanism. To overcome this drawback, an extensive version of SCA named Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm (iSCA) has been proposed in this work. The main concept is to introduce a nonlinear control strategy to the existing SCA’s exploration and exploitation process in order to synthesize the algorithm’s strength. The efficiency of this suggested algorithm is assessed using 23 classical well-known benchmark functions and the results are then verified by a comparative study with several other algorithms namely Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO), Multi-verse Optimization (MVO), Spiral Dynamic Optimization Algorithm (SDA) and Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Experimental results show that the iSCA is very competitive compared to the state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.","PeriodicalId":432464,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems\",\"authors\":\"M. H. Suid, M. Ahmad, M. Ismail, M. R. Ghazali, A. Irawan, M. Tumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPC.2018.8703982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to its simplicity and less tedious parameter tuning over other multi-agent-based optimization algorithms, Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) has gotten lots of attention from numerous researchers for resolving optimization problem. However, the existing SCA tends to have low optimization precision and local minima trapping effect due to the constraint in its exploration and exploitation mechanism. To overcome this drawback, an extensive version of SCA named Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm (iSCA) has been proposed in this work. The main concept is to introduce a nonlinear control strategy to the existing SCA’s exploration and exploitation process in order to synthesize the algorithm’s strength. The efficiency of this suggested algorithm is assessed using 23 classical well-known benchmark functions and the results are then verified by a comparative study with several other algorithms namely Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO), Multi-verse Optimization (MVO), Spiral Dynamic Optimization Algorithm (SDA) and Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Experimental results show that the iSCA is very competitive compared to the state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPC.2018.8703982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPC.2018.8703982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

正弦余弦算法(SCA)在求解优化问题方面,由于其相对于其他基于多智能体的优化算法的简单性和较少的参数调优繁琐性,受到了众多研究者的广泛关注。然而,现有的SCA由于其勘探开发机制的约束,往往存在优化精度低和局部最小捕获效应的问题。为了克服这个缺点,本工作提出了一个扩展版本的SCA,名为改进正弦余弦算法(iSCA)。其主要思想是在现有SCA的探索和开发过程中引入非线性控制策略,以综合算法的强度。利用23个经典的知名基准函数对该算法的效率进行了评估,并与Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO)、Multi-verse Optimization (MVO)、螺旋动态优化算法(SDA)和正弦余弦算法(SCA)等算法进行了对比研究。实验结果表明,与目前最先进的元启发式算法相比,iSCA算法具有很强的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems
Due to its simplicity and less tedious parameter tuning over other multi-agent-based optimization algorithms, Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) has gotten lots of attention from numerous researchers for resolving optimization problem. However, the existing SCA tends to have low optimization precision and local minima trapping effect due to the constraint in its exploration and exploitation mechanism. To overcome this drawback, an extensive version of SCA named Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm (iSCA) has been proposed in this work. The main concept is to introduce a nonlinear control strategy to the existing SCA’s exploration and exploitation process in order to synthesize the algorithm’s strength. The efficiency of this suggested algorithm is assessed using 23 classical well-known benchmark functions and the results are then verified by a comparative study with several other algorithms namely Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO), Multi-verse Optimization (MVO), Spiral Dynamic Optimization Algorithm (SDA) and Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Experimental results show that the iSCA is very competitive compared to the state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信