现金流量模型直接法和间接法预测未来利润的准确性比较

Helvoni Mahrina, Iwin Arnova
{"title":"现金流量模型直接法和间接法预测未来利润的准确性比较","authors":"Helvoni Mahrina, Iwin Arnova","doi":"10.32663/jaz.v4i1.2085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial reports are part of the financial reporting process. Complete financial statements usually include balance sheets, income statements, statements of changes in financial position (which can be presented in various ways, for example, as cash flow statements, or cash flow statements), notes and other reports and explanatory material that are an integral part of the financial statements. . The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence whether a model with a direct cash flow component has a more accurate predictive ability than a model with an indirect cash flow component to predict future earnings. The parameters of this research model were estimated using panel data regression. This study considers 4 regression methods of penel data, namely (1) linear regression model (OLS), (2) covariance model (FEM), (3) error components (ECM) model, (4) time series autocorrelation model (GLS) ( Thiono, 2007). The results of the analysis of this study are the direct method cash flow component is more accurate than the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in manufacturing companies, finding that the direct method component is more accurate than the indirect method. Then for the cash flow component model the direct method is more accurate than the model with the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in non-manufacturing companies, finding that the cash flow components of the direct method and the indirect method do not differ in their accuracy in predicting future earnings.","PeriodicalId":114688,"journal":{"name":"JAZ:Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Accuracy of Direct and Indirect Methods of Cash Flow Models in Predicting Future Profits\",\"authors\":\"Helvoni Mahrina, Iwin Arnova\",\"doi\":\"10.32663/jaz.v4i1.2085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial reports are part of the financial reporting process. Complete financial statements usually include balance sheets, income statements, statements of changes in financial position (which can be presented in various ways, for example, as cash flow statements, or cash flow statements), notes and other reports and explanatory material that are an integral part of the financial statements. . The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence whether a model with a direct cash flow component has a more accurate predictive ability than a model with an indirect cash flow component to predict future earnings. The parameters of this research model were estimated using panel data regression. This study considers 4 regression methods of penel data, namely (1) linear regression model (OLS), (2) covariance model (FEM), (3) error components (ECM) model, (4) time series autocorrelation model (GLS) ( Thiono, 2007). The results of the analysis of this study are the direct method cash flow component is more accurate than the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in manufacturing companies, finding that the direct method component is more accurate than the indirect method. Then for the cash flow component model the direct method is more accurate than the model with the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in non-manufacturing companies, finding that the cash flow components of the direct method and the indirect method do not differ in their accuracy in predicting future earnings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAZ:Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAZ:Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32663/jaz.v4i1.2085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAZ:Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32663/jaz.v4i1.2085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财务报告是财务报告过程的一部分。完整的财务报表通常包括资产负债表、损益表、财务状况变动表(可以以各种方式列报,例如现金流量表或现金流量表)、附注和其他报告及解释性材料,这些都是财务报表的组成部分。本研究的目的是提供实证证据,证明具有直接现金流量成分的模型是否比具有间接现金流量成分的模型具有更准确的预测未来收益的能力。本研究模型的参数采用面板数据回归估计。本研究考虑了4种penel数据的回归方法,即(1)线性回归模型(OLS),(2)协方差模型(FEM),(3)误差分量模型(ECM),(4)时间序列自相关模型(GLS) (Thiono, 2007)。本研究的分析结果是直接法现金流量分量比间接法现金流量分量在预测制造业企业未来收益方面更准确,发现直接法现金流量分量比间接法更准确。然后,对于现金流量成分模型,直接法比间接法现金流量成分模型更准确地预测非制造业公司的未来收益,发现直接法和间接法的现金流量成分在预测未来收益的准确性上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Accuracy of Direct and Indirect Methods of Cash Flow Models in Predicting Future Profits
Financial reports are part of the financial reporting process. Complete financial statements usually include balance sheets, income statements, statements of changes in financial position (which can be presented in various ways, for example, as cash flow statements, or cash flow statements), notes and other reports and explanatory material that are an integral part of the financial statements. . The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence whether a model with a direct cash flow component has a more accurate predictive ability than a model with an indirect cash flow component to predict future earnings. The parameters of this research model were estimated using panel data regression. This study considers 4 regression methods of penel data, namely (1) linear regression model (OLS), (2) covariance model (FEM), (3) error components (ECM) model, (4) time series autocorrelation model (GLS) ( Thiono, 2007). The results of the analysis of this study are the direct method cash flow component is more accurate than the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in manufacturing companies, finding that the direct method component is more accurate than the indirect method. Then for the cash flow component model the direct method is more accurate than the model with the indirect method cash flow component in predicting future earnings in non-manufacturing companies, finding that the cash flow components of the direct method and the indirect method do not differ in their accuracy in predicting future earnings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信