三种聚焦误差检测方法的理论模型及比较

Optical Storage and Information Data Storage Pub Date : 1993-08-13 DOI:10.1117/12.150660

Song Shen, D. Cui, Xiong Qian, Yongming Shu

{"title":"三种聚焦误差检测方法的理论模型及比较","authors":"Song Shen, D. Cui, Xiong Qian, Yongming Shu","doi":"10.1117/12.150660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison of three common focus error detection methods is made on a unified theoretical background. New mathematical models are built up on physical optics. The compared items are theoretical optical gain, adjustment factors, etc., and the theoretical and experimental results are given.","PeriodicalId":212484,"journal":{"name":"Optical Storage and Information Data Storage","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical models and comparison of three focus-error detection methods\",\"authors\":\"Song Shen, D. Cui, Xiong Qian, Yongming Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.150660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparison of three common focus error detection methods is made on a unified theoretical background. New mathematical models are built up on physical optics. The compared items are theoretical optical gain, adjustment factors, etc., and the theoretical and experimental results are given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optical Storage and Information Data Storage\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optical Storage and Information Data Storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.150660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Storage and Information Data Storage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.150660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在统一的理论背景下，对常用的三种调焦误差检测方法进行了比较。在物理光学上建立了新的数学模型。比较了理论光增益、调整系数等项目，并给出了理论和实验结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Theoretical models and comparison of three focus-error detection methods

Comparison of three common focus error detection methods is made on a unified theoretical background. New mathematical models are built up on physical optics. The compared items are theoretical optical gain, adjustment factors, etc., and the theoretical and experimental results are given.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Optical Storage and Information Data Storage

自引率

0.00%

发文量