尼日利亚与美国公司治理理念比较分析(美国)

Rahmah Oladejo
{"title":"尼日利亚与美国公司治理理念比较分析(美国)","authors":"Rahmah Oladejo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3888221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate Governance is a recent global development that has attracted the attention of corporate investors, researchers, and governments. It arose out of the need to address sudden collapses and failures of big businesses and corporate bodies in every angle of today’s world. \n \nIn the last decade, there has been increased focus worldwide on corporate governance in terms of structure, processes, systems, and practices which drive the conduct of business. This is in recognition of the critical role of corporate governance in the success or otherwise of companies. \nThe need for renewed corporate governance in Nigeria arose out of the realization that corporate governance has not been given adequate attention it deserves in most developing countries. For instance, it is on record that many of the thirty-four Nigerian banks that had their operating license revoked between the late ‘80s and early ‘90s suffered from poor corporate governance. \n \nThe United States of America (USA) is arguably the biggest economy of the world. It is argued that it produces twenty-one percent (21%) of the total world output through millions of business firms operating in its territory. It is generally assumed that US human capital is more productive and business firms are more efficient. Thus, the US firms have been obtaining efficiency gains vis-a-vis their European and Asian competitors. This is often attributed to good corporate governance. \n \nThis study seeks to examine the level of corporate governance in Nigeria and the United States of America. The work will compare both systems in order to identify areas of difference and similarities and establish how they can be of benefit to stakeholders in both countries with a view to identifying factors that led to the collapse of businesses and corporations on account of the inapplicable methodology of Corporate Governance. \n \nDifferent scholars and researchers have used both qualitative and quantitative methods in analyzing corporate governance in Nigeria. Quantitative methods are usually used in assessing the effectiveness of corporate governance on different variables such as productivity and profitability. Qualitative methods on the other hand are used to assess the effectiveness of corporate governance in preventing future collapses by analyzing previous collapses. \n \nThis study shall thus make use of the Qualitative Method. This study will be evaluating the corporate governance codes and its effectiveness in preventing future corporate collapses and scandals in Nigeria. It would compare the Nigerian corporate governance code to that of the United States as a measure of its standard and effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":201560,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Corporate Governance in Nigeria and the United States of America (USA)\",\"authors\":\"Rahmah Oladejo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3888221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corporate Governance is a recent global development that has attracted the attention of corporate investors, researchers, and governments. It arose out of the need to address sudden collapses and failures of big businesses and corporate bodies in every angle of today’s world. \\n \\nIn the last decade, there has been increased focus worldwide on corporate governance in terms of structure, processes, systems, and practices which drive the conduct of business. This is in recognition of the critical role of corporate governance in the success or otherwise of companies. \\nThe need for renewed corporate governance in Nigeria arose out of the realization that corporate governance has not been given adequate attention it deserves in most developing countries. For instance, it is on record that many of the thirty-four Nigerian banks that had their operating license revoked between the late ‘80s and early ‘90s suffered from poor corporate governance. \\n \\nThe United States of America (USA) is arguably the biggest economy of the world. It is argued that it produces twenty-one percent (21%) of the total world output through millions of business firms operating in its territory. It is generally assumed that US human capital is more productive and business firms are more efficient. Thus, the US firms have been obtaining efficiency gains vis-a-vis their European and Asian competitors. This is often attributed to good corporate governance. \\n \\nThis study seeks to examine the level of corporate governance in Nigeria and the United States of America. The work will compare both systems in order to identify areas of difference and similarities and establish how they can be of benefit to stakeholders in both countries with a view to identifying factors that led to the collapse of businesses and corporations on account of the inapplicable methodology of Corporate Governance. \\n \\nDifferent scholars and researchers have used both qualitative and quantitative methods in analyzing corporate governance in Nigeria. Quantitative methods are usually used in assessing the effectiveness of corporate governance on different variables such as productivity and profitability. Qualitative methods on the other hand are used to assess the effectiveness of corporate governance in preventing future collapses by analyzing previous collapses. \\n \\nThis study shall thus make use of the Qualitative Method. This study will be evaluating the corporate governance codes and its effectiveness in preventing future corporate collapses and scandals in Nigeria. It would compare the Nigerian corporate governance code to that of the United States as a measure of its standard and effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公司治理是近年来在全球范围内兴起的一项新发展,引起了企业投资者、研究人员和政府的关注。它产生于解决当今世界各个角度的大企业和法人团体突然崩溃和失败的需要。在过去的十年中,全球范围内越来越多地关注公司治理,包括驱动业务行为的结构、流程、系统和实践。这是对公司治理在公司成功与否中所起关键作用的认可。尼日利亚需要更新公司治理,是因为认识到公司治理在大多数发展中国家没有得到应有的充分重视。例如,有记录显示,在上世纪80年代末至90年代初被吊销营业执照的34家尼日利亚银行中,有许多银行的公司治理不善。美利坚合众国可以说是世界上最大的经济体。有人认为,通过在其领土上经营的数百万商业公司,它生产了世界总产量的21%(21%)。人们普遍认为,美国的人力资本生产率更高,商业公司效率更高。因此,相对于欧洲和亚洲的竞争对手,美国公司一直在获得效率上的提升。这通常归因于良好的公司治理。本研究旨在考察尼日利亚和美利坚合众国的公司治理水平。这项工作将比较两种制度,以确定差异和相似之处,并确定它们如何使两国的利益相关者受益,以确定由于公司治理方法不适用而导致企业和公司崩溃的因素。不同的学者和研究人员使用定性和定量的方法来分析尼日利亚的公司治理。定量方法通常用于评估公司治理对不同变量(如生产率和盈利能力)的有效性。另一方面,定性方法是通过分析以前的崩溃来评估公司治理在防止未来崩溃方面的有效性。因此,本研究将采用定性方法。本研究将评估公司治理守则及其在防止未来公司倒闭和丑闻在尼日利亚的有效性。它将把尼日利亚的公司治理准则与美国的公司治理准则进行比较,以衡量其标准和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Corporate Governance in Nigeria and the United States of America (USA)
Corporate Governance is a recent global development that has attracted the attention of corporate investors, researchers, and governments. It arose out of the need to address sudden collapses and failures of big businesses and corporate bodies in every angle of today’s world. In the last decade, there has been increased focus worldwide on corporate governance in terms of structure, processes, systems, and practices which drive the conduct of business. This is in recognition of the critical role of corporate governance in the success or otherwise of companies. The need for renewed corporate governance in Nigeria arose out of the realization that corporate governance has not been given adequate attention it deserves in most developing countries. For instance, it is on record that many of the thirty-four Nigerian banks that had their operating license revoked between the late ‘80s and early ‘90s suffered from poor corporate governance. The United States of America (USA) is arguably the biggest economy of the world. It is argued that it produces twenty-one percent (21%) of the total world output through millions of business firms operating in its territory. It is generally assumed that US human capital is more productive and business firms are more efficient. Thus, the US firms have been obtaining efficiency gains vis-a-vis their European and Asian competitors. This is often attributed to good corporate governance. This study seeks to examine the level of corporate governance in Nigeria and the United States of America. The work will compare both systems in order to identify areas of difference and similarities and establish how they can be of benefit to stakeholders in both countries with a view to identifying factors that led to the collapse of businesses and corporations on account of the inapplicable methodology of Corporate Governance. Different scholars and researchers have used both qualitative and quantitative methods in analyzing corporate governance in Nigeria. Quantitative methods are usually used in assessing the effectiveness of corporate governance on different variables such as productivity and profitability. Qualitative methods on the other hand are used to assess the effectiveness of corporate governance in preventing future collapses by analyzing previous collapses. This study shall thus make use of the Qualitative Method. This study will be evaluating the corporate governance codes and its effectiveness in preventing future corporate collapses and scandals in Nigeria. It would compare the Nigerian corporate governance code to that of the United States as a measure of its standard and effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信