{"title":"内镜超声和PDT诊断胰腺癌","authors":"J. DeWitt","doi":"10.1117/12.2528591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: In a single-center, prospective, dose-escalation phase 1 study, patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) received intravenous porfimer sodium followed 2 days later by EUS-PDT. EUS-PDT was performed by puncture with a 19-gauge needle and insertion of a 1.0-cm light diffuser and illumination with a 630-nm light. A CT scan 18 days after PDT was done to assess for change in pancreatic necrosis. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine were initiated 7 days after CT. Results: Twelve patients (mean age, 67 ± 6 years; 8 male) with tumors (mean diameter, 45.2 ± 12.9 mm) in the head and/or neck (8) or body and/or tail (4) underwent EUS-PDT. Compared with baseline imaging, increased volume and percentage of tumor necrosis were observed in 6 of 12 patients (50%) after EUS-PDT. No serious adverse events from PDT occurred. Conclusion: EUS-PDT for LAPC is technically feasible. Phase II studies are warranted.","PeriodicalId":267589,"journal":{"name":"World Congress of the International Photodynamic Association","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic ultrasound and PDT for pancreatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"J. DeWitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2528591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims: In a single-center, prospective, dose-escalation phase 1 study, patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) received intravenous porfimer sodium followed 2 days later by EUS-PDT. EUS-PDT was performed by puncture with a 19-gauge needle and insertion of a 1.0-cm light diffuser and illumination with a 630-nm light. A CT scan 18 days after PDT was done to assess for change in pancreatic necrosis. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine were initiated 7 days after CT. Results: Twelve patients (mean age, 67 ± 6 years; 8 male) with tumors (mean diameter, 45.2 ± 12.9 mm) in the head and/or neck (8) or body and/or tail (4) underwent EUS-PDT. Compared with baseline imaging, increased volume and percentage of tumor necrosis were observed in 6 of 12 patients (50%) after EUS-PDT. No serious adverse events from PDT occurred. Conclusion: EUS-PDT for LAPC is technically feasible. Phase II studies are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Congress of the International Photodynamic Association\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Congress of the International Photodynamic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2528591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Congress of the International Photodynamic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2528591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic ultrasound and PDT for pancreatic cancer
Background and Aims: In a single-center, prospective, dose-escalation phase 1 study, patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) received intravenous porfimer sodium followed 2 days later by EUS-PDT. EUS-PDT was performed by puncture with a 19-gauge needle and insertion of a 1.0-cm light diffuser and illumination with a 630-nm light. A CT scan 18 days after PDT was done to assess for change in pancreatic necrosis. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine were initiated 7 days after CT. Results: Twelve patients (mean age, 67 ± 6 years; 8 male) with tumors (mean diameter, 45.2 ± 12.9 mm) in the head and/or neck (8) or body and/or tail (4) underwent EUS-PDT. Compared with baseline imaging, increased volume and percentage of tumor necrosis were observed in 6 of 12 patients (50%) after EUS-PDT. No serious adverse events from PDT occurred. Conclusion: EUS-PDT for LAPC is technically feasible. Phase II studies are warranted.