VPAF:用于建立和监视长时间授权关系的灵活框架

E. Freudenthal, Bivas Das
{"title":"VPAF:用于建立和监视长时间授权关系的灵活框架","authors":"E. Freudenthal, Bivas Das","doi":"10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM2009.8366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a generic framework for determining and monitoring access rights derived from credential documents. Distributed authorization systems intended to support collaborative coalitions (such as Trust Management systems) typically incorporate mechanisms to both validate credentials, and to determine authorization. This conjunction of distinct functions increases complexity of both components and limits overall flexibility. Furthermore, while authorization decisions frequently enable the commencement of a prolonged relationship, current authorization systems are designed to authorize instantaneous transactions and provide no mechanisms to detect and propagate revocation after an authorization decision is made. VPAF (a Validated and Prolonged Authorization Framework) will separate these duties in a manner that permits credential validation and authorization decisions to be managed separately. VPAF is intended to enable vigilant monitoring of prolonged authorization relationships that span mutually distrustful administrative domains such as is common when multiple organizations collaborate.","PeriodicalId":232795,"journal":{"name":"2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VPAF: a flexible framework for establishing and monitoring prolonged authorization relationships\",\"authors\":\"E. Freudenthal, Bivas Das\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM2009.8366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe a generic framework for determining and monitoring access rights derived from credential documents. Distributed authorization systems intended to support collaborative coalitions (such as Trust Management systems) typically incorporate mechanisms to both validate credentials, and to determine authorization. This conjunction of distinct functions increases complexity of both components and limits overall flexibility. Furthermore, while authorization decisions frequently enable the commencement of a prolonged relationship, current authorization systems are designed to authorize instantaneous transactions and provide no mechanisms to detect and propagate revocation after an authorization decision is made. VPAF (a Validated and Prolonged Authorization Framework) will separate these duties in a manner that permits credential validation and authorization decisions to be managed separately. VPAF is intended to enable vigilant monitoring of prolonged authorization relationships that span mutually distrustful administrative domains such as is common when multiple organizations collaborate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM2009.8366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM2009.8366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们描述了一个通用框架,用于确定和监视来自凭证文档的访问权限。用于支持协作联盟(如信任管理系统)的分布式授权系统通常包含验证凭据和确定授权的机制。这种不同功能的结合增加了两个组件的复杂性,限制了整体的灵活性。此外,虽然授权决策经常启用长时间关系的开始,但当前的授权系统被设计为授权即时事务,并且没有提供在做出授权决策后检测和传播撤销的机制。VPAF(验证和延长授权框架)将以一种允许分别管理凭据验证和授权决策的方式分离这些职责。VPAF旨在对跨相互不信任的管理域(如多个组织协作时常见的情况)的长时间授权关系进行警惕监视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VPAF: a flexible framework for establishing and monitoring prolonged authorization relationships
We describe a generic framework for determining and monitoring access rights derived from credential documents. Distributed authorization systems intended to support collaborative coalitions (such as Trust Management systems) typically incorporate mechanisms to both validate credentials, and to determine authorization. This conjunction of distinct functions increases complexity of both components and limits overall flexibility. Furthermore, while authorization decisions frequently enable the commencement of a prolonged relationship, current authorization systems are designed to authorize instantaneous transactions and provide no mechanisms to detect and propagate revocation after an authorization decision is made. VPAF (a Validated and Prolonged Authorization Framework) will separate these duties in a manner that permits credential validation and authorization decisions to be managed separately. VPAF is intended to enable vigilant monitoring of prolonged authorization relationships that span mutually distrustful administrative domains such as is common when multiple organizations collaborate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信