Milica Pavlović Turkalj
{"title":"POJMOVNO ODREĐENjE KAZNENOG POSTUPKA PREMA EVROPSKOJ KONVENCIJI ZA ZAŠTITU LjUDSKIH PRAVA I OSNOVNIH SLOBODA","authors":"Milica Pavlović Turkalj","doi":"10.46793/gp.1301.073pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, the author elaborates on the problem of defining the term of criminal procedure through Articles 6 and 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom and through Article 4 of Protocol 7 and draws a parallel between the understanding of criminal procedure from the perspective of the ECHR and national law. Also, the author deals with the considirations of the European Court of Human Rights regarding of the concept of “criminal charge”, as the backbone of criminal procedure. In this regard, the author pays significant attention to the Engel criteria (the legal qualification of the offence under the internal law of a given State, the very nature of the offence and the type and the degree of affilaction of the penalty for which a given individual is liable) by means of which it is determined whether a specific case can be considered criminal from the point of view of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1301.073pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过《欧洲人权与基本自由公约》第6条和第7条以及《欧洲人权公约》第7议定书第4条阐述了刑事诉讼期限的界定问题,并从《欧洲人权公约》和国内法的角度对刑事诉讼程序的理解进行了比较。此外,作者还讨论了欧洲人权法院对作为刑事诉讼程序支柱的“刑事指控”概念的考虑。在这方面,发件人十分注意恩格尔标准(某一国家国内法规定的罪行的法律资格、罪行的性质以及某一个人应受惩罚的类型和程度),据此确定某一具体案件是否可以从《欧洲人权和基本自由公约》的观点被视为刑事案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POJMOVNO ODREĐENjE KAZNENOG POSTUPKA PREMA EVROPSKOJ KONVENCIJI ZA ZAŠTITU LjUDSKIH PRAVA I OSNOVNIH SLOBODA
In the paper, the author elaborates on the problem of defining the term of criminal procedure through Articles 6 and 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom and through Article 4 of Protocol 7 and draws a parallel between the understanding of criminal procedure from the perspective of the ECHR and national law. Also, the author deals with the considirations of the European Court of Human Rights regarding of the concept of “criminal charge”, as the backbone of criminal procedure. In this regard, the author pays significant attention to the Engel criteria (the legal qualification of the offence under the internal law of a given State, the very nature of the offence and the type and the degree of affilaction of the penalty for which a given individual is liable) by means of which it is determined whether a specific case can be considered criminal from the point of view of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信