重访焦点投射:德语的音高重音感知

K. Kuthy, Britta Stolterfoht
{"title":"重访焦点投射:德语的音高重音感知","authors":"K. Kuthy, Britta Stolterfoht","doi":"10.1515/9783110623093-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the important insights of the recent intensive study of information structure is that for intonation languages like English and German, there is a close relation between focus and prosodic prominence. More specifically, it is now widely accepted as a fact that in such languages focus is signaled by pitch accents. But one issue that is still much discussed is the nature of pitch accent placement in the focussed part of an utterance: is it determined by syntactic, pragmatic, or purely metrical factors or a combination of these? One line of research has established that there are syntactic rules that determine accent placement in focus structures, with the F-marking approach of Selkirk (1995) and the SAAR (Sentence Accent Assignment Rule) of Gussenhoven (1983) serving as prominent foundations. One prediction of these approaches is that certain accent patterns are ambiguous with respect to the possible focus domain: a pitch accent in a certain position can signal focus just on one word (narrow focus) or on a larger constituent (broad focus). The empirical question that arises from this claim is: is there any evidence that these accent patterns are really perceived as ambiguous between different focus interpretations by listeners? In this chapter, we report on a perception experiment for German in which we tested whether listeners judge certain accent patterns as equally acceptable in different focus structure contexts. The results of the study will give an indication whether listeners perceive pitch accents in certain positions as ambiguous with respect to the possible information structuring of an utterance.","PeriodicalId":256493,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Focus","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focus projection revisited: Pitch accent perception in German\",\"authors\":\"K. Kuthy, Britta Stolterfoht\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110623093-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the important insights of the recent intensive study of information structure is that for intonation languages like English and German, there is a close relation between focus and prosodic prominence. More specifically, it is now widely accepted as a fact that in such languages focus is signaled by pitch accents. But one issue that is still much discussed is the nature of pitch accent placement in the focussed part of an utterance: is it determined by syntactic, pragmatic, or purely metrical factors or a combination of these? One line of research has established that there are syntactic rules that determine accent placement in focus structures, with the F-marking approach of Selkirk (1995) and the SAAR (Sentence Accent Assignment Rule) of Gussenhoven (1983) serving as prominent foundations. One prediction of these approaches is that certain accent patterns are ambiguous with respect to the possible focus domain: a pitch accent in a certain position can signal focus just on one word (narrow focus) or on a larger constituent (broad focus). The empirical question that arises from this claim is: is there any evidence that these accent patterns are really perceived as ambiguous between different focus interpretations by listeners? In this chapter, we report on a perception experiment for German in which we tested whether listeners judge certain accent patterns as equally acceptable in different focus structure contexts. The results of the study will give an indication whether listeners perceive pitch accents in certain positions as ambiguous with respect to the possible information structuring of an utterance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experiments in Focus\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experiments in Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110623093-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110623093-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近对信息结构深入研究的一个重要见解是,对于像英语和德语这样的语调语言,焦点和韵律突出之间存在着密切的关系。更具体地说,现在被广泛接受的一个事实是,在这些语言中,注意力是通过音高口音来表示的。但是有一个问题仍然被讨论得很多,那就是语音集中部分的音高重音位置的本质:它是由句法、语用、还是纯粹的韵律因素决定的,还是这些因素的结合?一项研究表明,有句法规则决定重音在焦点结构中的位置,Selkirk(1995)的f标记方法和Gussenhoven(1983)的SAAR(句子重音分配规则)是突出的基础。这些方法的一个预测是,某些重音模式在可能的焦点域上是模糊的:某个位置的音高重音可能表明焦点只集中在一个词上(窄焦点),也可能集中在一个更大的成分上(宽焦点)。由此产生的经验问题是:是否有证据表明,这些口音模式在不同的焦点解释之间真的被听众认为是模糊的?在本章中,我们报告了一个关于德语的感知实验,在这个实验中,我们测试了听者在不同的焦点结构语境中是否同样可以接受某些口音模式。这项研究的结果将表明,听者是否认为某些位置的音高口音与话语可能的信息结构有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focus projection revisited: Pitch accent perception in German
One of the important insights of the recent intensive study of information structure is that for intonation languages like English and German, there is a close relation between focus and prosodic prominence. More specifically, it is now widely accepted as a fact that in such languages focus is signaled by pitch accents. But one issue that is still much discussed is the nature of pitch accent placement in the focussed part of an utterance: is it determined by syntactic, pragmatic, or purely metrical factors or a combination of these? One line of research has established that there are syntactic rules that determine accent placement in focus structures, with the F-marking approach of Selkirk (1995) and the SAAR (Sentence Accent Assignment Rule) of Gussenhoven (1983) serving as prominent foundations. One prediction of these approaches is that certain accent patterns are ambiguous with respect to the possible focus domain: a pitch accent in a certain position can signal focus just on one word (narrow focus) or on a larger constituent (broad focus). The empirical question that arises from this claim is: is there any evidence that these accent patterns are really perceived as ambiguous between different focus interpretations by listeners? In this chapter, we report on a perception experiment for German in which we tested whether listeners judge certain accent patterns as equally acceptable in different focus structure contexts. The results of the study will give an indication whether listeners perceive pitch accents in certain positions as ambiguous with respect to the possible information structuring of an utterance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信