{"title":"LBG和SOA码本对VQ最小失真编码计算复杂度的比较研究","authors":"F. Madeiro, M. S. Vajapeyam, B. Neto","doi":"10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Vector quantization (VQ),is a well-known compression technique which has been widely used in many speech and image coding systems. Techniques for codebook design attempt to produce a codebook that is optimum for a given source. To date, the most widely used technique for VQ codebook design is the LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray) algorithm. Madeim et al. (1999) show that an unsupervised neural network algorithm, referred to as SOA (self-organizing algorithm), provides good VQ codebooks, leading to reconstructed signals with better quality when compared to the ones obtained by using LBG codebooks. In this paper, an investigation is carried out to evaluate the \"inherent\" quality of SOA and LBG codebooks regarding the computational complexity of medium distortion encoding. The present work shows that the SOA codebooks overperforms the LBG codebooks in the sense that they yield a smaller average number of multiplications per sample for image VQ.","PeriodicalId":448461,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of LBG and SOA codebooks concerning the computational complexity of the minimum distortion encoding for VQ\",\"authors\":\"F. Madeiro, M. S. Vajapeyam, B. Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. Vector quantization (VQ),is a well-known compression technique which has been widely used in many speech and image coding systems. Techniques for codebook design attempt to produce a codebook that is optimum for a given source. To date, the most widely used technique for VQ codebook design is the LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray) algorithm. Madeim et al. (1999) show that an unsupervised neural network algorithm, referred to as SOA (self-organizing algorithm), provides good VQ codebooks, leading to reconstructed signals with better quality when compared to the ones obtained by using LBG codebooks. In this paper, an investigation is carried out to evaluate the \\\"inherent\\\" quality of SOA and LBG codebooks regarding the computational complexity of medium distortion encoding. The present work shows that the SOA codebooks overperforms the LBG codebooks in the sense that they yield a smaller average number of multiplications per sample for image VQ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBRN.2000.889754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
只提供摘要形式。矢量量化(VQ)是一种众所周知的压缩技术,已广泛应用于许多语音和图像编码系统中。码本设计技术试图产生对给定源最优的码本。迄今为止,VQ码本设计中最广泛使用的技术是LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray)算法。Madeim et al.(1999)表明,一种被称为SOA(自组织算法)的无监督神经网络算法提供了良好的VQ码本,与使用LBG码本获得的信号相比,重构的信号质量更好。在本文中,进行了一项调查,以评估SOA和LBG码本在中等失真编码的计算复杂性方面的“固有”质量。目前的工作表明,SOA码本的性能优于LBG码本,因为它们对图像VQ产生的每个样本的平均乘法次数更少。
A comparative study of LBG and SOA codebooks concerning the computational complexity of the minimum distortion encoding for VQ
Summary form only given. Vector quantization (VQ),is a well-known compression technique which has been widely used in many speech and image coding systems. Techniques for codebook design attempt to produce a codebook that is optimum for a given source. To date, the most widely used technique for VQ codebook design is the LBG (Linde-Buzo-Gray) algorithm. Madeim et al. (1999) show that an unsupervised neural network algorithm, referred to as SOA (self-organizing algorithm), provides good VQ codebooks, leading to reconstructed signals with better quality when compared to the ones obtained by using LBG codebooks. In this paper, an investigation is carried out to evaluate the "inherent" quality of SOA and LBG codebooks regarding the computational complexity of medium distortion encoding. The present work shows that the SOA codebooks overperforms the LBG codebooks in the sense that they yield a smaller average number of multiplications per sample for image VQ.