转换教学法,转换实践:教师对英语语言艺术项目学习的看法

Karoline Trepper, Alison G. Boardman, Antero Garcia
{"title":"转换教学法,转换实践:教师对英语语言艺术项目学习的看法","authors":"Karoline Trepper, Alison G. Boardman, Antero Garcia","doi":"10.1108/etpc-12-2021-0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore teachers’ shifts in pedagogy and practice as they implemented a project-based learning (PBL) approach to teaching English Language Arts (ELA) for the first time.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors interviewed 10 ninth-grade ELA teachers in three schools after their first year enacting PBL. Initial codes were developed deductively from the interview questions and others emerged from the data. The authors also used memos to contextualize the interviews and triangulate findings.\n\n\nFindings\nTeachers described embracing new, expansive approaches to teaching ELA as they shifted from focusing on skills to big questions, and from literary analysis to “real-world” writing and assessment. These data illuminated three tensions around “traditional” versus PBL approaches to ELA: What counts as ELA? What counts as student success? And is PBL for everyone?\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFew studies have explored teacher perceptions of PBL in secondary ELA classrooms. This paper uniquely illuminates some pathways for addressing the tension between “traditional” and PBL approaches. The authors call for deliberate, ongoing and gradualistic approaches to engaging in PBL routines that support educators to make meaningful shifts in instruction.\n","PeriodicalId":428767,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting pedagogy, shifting practice: teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning in English language arts\",\"authors\":\"Karoline Trepper, Alison G. Boardman, Antero Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/etpc-12-2021-0150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to explore teachers’ shifts in pedagogy and practice as they implemented a project-based learning (PBL) approach to teaching English Language Arts (ELA) for the first time.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors interviewed 10 ninth-grade ELA teachers in three schools after their first year enacting PBL. Initial codes were developed deductively from the interview questions and others emerged from the data. The authors also used memos to contextualize the interviews and triangulate findings.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nTeachers described embracing new, expansive approaches to teaching ELA as they shifted from focusing on skills to big questions, and from literary analysis to “real-world” writing and assessment. These data illuminated three tensions around “traditional” versus PBL approaches to ELA: What counts as ELA? What counts as student success? And is PBL for everyone?\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nFew studies have explored teacher perceptions of PBL in secondary ELA classrooms. This paper uniquely illuminates some pathways for addressing the tension between “traditional” and PBL approaches. The authors call for deliberate, ongoing and gradualistic approaches to engaging in PBL routines that support educators to make meaningful shifts in instruction.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":428767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-12-2021-0150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-12-2021-0150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在探讨教师首次在英语语言艺术(ELA)教学中实施基于项目的学习(PBL)方法时在教学法和实践上的转变。设计/方法/方法作者在实施PBL的第一年采访了三所学校的10名九年级ELA教师。最初的代码是从采访问题中推导出来的,其他代码则是从数据中产生的。作者还使用备忘录将访谈背景化,并对调查结果进行三角测量。教师们表示,随着他们从关注技能转向关注大问题,从关注文学分析转向关注“现实世界”的写作和评估,他们接受了新的、广泛的教学方法。这些数据阐明了围绕“传统”与PBL方法之间的三个矛盾:什么算ELA?怎样算学生的成功?PBL适用于所有人吗?创新/价值很少有研究探讨教师在中学语文教育课堂中对PBL的看法。本文独特地阐明了解决“传统”和PBL方法之间紧张关系的一些途径。作者呼吁采取深思熟虑的、持续的和渐进的方法来参与PBL的日常工作,以支持教育者在教学中做出有意义的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shifting pedagogy, shifting practice: teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning in English language arts
Purpose This paper aims to explore teachers’ shifts in pedagogy and practice as they implemented a project-based learning (PBL) approach to teaching English Language Arts (ELA) for the first time. Design/methodology/approach The authors interviewed 10 ninth-grade ELA teachers in three schools after their first year enacting PBL. Initial codes were developed deductively from the interview questions and others emerged from the data. The authors also used memos to contextualize the interviews and triangulate findings. Findings Teachers described embracing new, expansive approaches to teaching ELA as they shifted from focusing on skills to big questions, and from literary analysis to “real-world” writing and assessment. These data illuminated three tensions around “traditional” versus PBL approaches to ELA: What counts as ELA? What counts as student success? And is PBL for everyone? Originality/value Few studies have explored teacher perceptions of PBL in secondary ELA classrooms. This paper uniquely illuminates some pathways for addressing the tension between “traditional” and PBL approaches. The authors call for deliberate, ongoing and gradualistic approaches to engaging in PBL routines that support educators to make meaningful shifts in instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信