A. M. Zadorozhny, M. Borgoyakova, E. Starostina, L. Karpenko
{"title":"携带SARS-CoV-2抗原的dna -蛋白组合构建物的细胞免疫应答","authors":"A. M. Zadorozhny, M. Borgoyakova, E. Starostina, L. Karpenko","doi":"10.17816/maj108654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: One approach that makes it possible to create vaccines relatively quickly and inexpensively is the creation of DNA vaccine constructs. They are of particular interest for the prevention of COVID-19, as they induce both types of immune response humoral and T cell. Previously, we have created two DNA vaccines based on the pVAX vector: one encodes the full gene of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the second only encodes the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Next, the naked DNA was wrapped in a polycationic polyglucin-spermidine complex conjugated with the RBD protein. The resulting combined DNA-protein constructs were named CCV-RBD and CCV-S, respectively. \nAIM: To investigate the induction of the T cell immune response of the developed combined DNA protein candidate vaccines in an animal model. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: BALB/c mice were immunized with constructs CCV-RBD and CCV-S, after which their spleens were removed from which splenocytes were isolated. The cellular response was assessed by the ability of splenocytes to secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides. The intensity of the response was recorded using the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) method using flow cytometry. \nRESULTS: BALB/c mice were immunized twice with an interval of three weeks with a dose of 100 g of DNA (8 animals per group): 1) CCV-RBD 2) CCV-S and 3) intact animals. It has been shown that both T helper lymphocytes (CD4+) and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD8+) of animals immunized with CCV-S and CCV-RBD respond with the release of cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides. \nCONCLUSIONS: In the case of CCV-RBD, a trend towards a higher response in both CD4+ and CD8+ was observed compared to the CCV-S group. Possibly, this difference may be due to more efficient synthesis of the RBD protein than the S protein, providing a DNA vaccine.","PeriodicalId":342669,"journal":{"name":"Medical academic journal","volume":"44 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cellular immune response to combined DNA-protein constructs carrying SARS-CoV-2 antigens\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Zadorozhny, M. Borgoyakova, E. Starostina, L. Karpenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/maj108654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: One approach that makes it possible to create vaccines relatively quickly and inexpensively is the creation of DNA vaccine constructs. They are of particular interest for the prevention of COVID-19, as they induce both types of immune response humoral and T cell. Previously, we have created two DNA vaccines based on the pVAX vector: one encodes the full gene of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the second only encodes the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Next, the naked DNA was wrapped in a polycationic polyglucin-spermidine complex conjugated with the RBD protein. The resulting combined DNA-protein constructs were named CCV-RBD and CCV-S, respectively. \\nAIM: To investigate the induction of the T cell immune response of the developed combined DNA protein candidate vaccines in an animal model. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: BALB/c mice were immunized with constructs CCV-RBD and CCV-S, after which their spleens were removed from which splenocytes were isolated. The cellular response was assessed by the ability of splenocytes to secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides. The intensity of the response was recorded using the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) method using flow cytometry. \\nRESULTS: BALB/c mice were immunized twice with an interval of three weeks with a dose of 100 g of DNA (8 animals per group): 1) CCV-RBD 2) CCV-S and 3) intact animals. It has been shown that both T helper lymphocytes (CD4+) and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD8+) of animals immunized with CCV-S and CCV-RBD respond with the release of cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides. \\nCONCLUSIONS: In the case of CCV-RBD, a trend towards a higher response in both CD4+ and CD8+ was observed compared to the CCV-S group. Possibly, this difference may be due to more efficient synthesis of the RBD protein than the S protein, providing a DNA vaccine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical academic journal\",\"volume\":\"44 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical academic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/maj108654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical academic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/maj108654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:一种使制造相对快速和廉价的疫苗成为可能的方法是制造DNA疫苗结构。它们对预防COVID-19特别感兴趣,因为它们诱导两种类型的免疫反应体液和T细胞。此前,我们基于pVAX载体研制了两种DNA疫苗:一种编码SARS-CoV-2病毒S蛋白的全基因,另一种仅编码SARS-CoV-2病毒S蛋白的受体结合域(RBD)。接下来,将裸露的DNA包裹在与RBD蛋白结合的多阳离子聚葡聚糖-亚精胺复合物中。所得到的dna -蛋白组合构建体分别被命名为CCV-RBD和CCV-S。目的:研究研制的DNA蛋白联合候选疫苗在动物模型上诱导T细胞免疫应答的作用。材料与方法:采用构建的CCV-RBD和CCV-S免疫BALB/c小鼠,取其脾,分离脾细胞。细胞反应是通过脾细胞在病毒肽刺激下分泌细胞因子的能力来评估的。采用流式细胞术细胞内细胞因子染色(ICS)方法记录反应强度。结果:BALB/c小鼠以100 g DNA免疫2次(每组8只),免疫间隔为3周:1)CCV-RBD 2) CCV-S和3)完整动物。研究表明,CCV-S和CCV-RBD免疫动物的辅助性T淋巴细胞(CD4+)和细胞毒性淋巴细胞(CD8+)在病毒肽刺激下会释放细胞因子。结论:在CCV-RBD病例中,与CCV-S组相比,CD4+和CD8+的反应都有更高的趋势。这种差异可能是由于RBD蛋白的合成比S蛋白更有效,从而提供了DNA疫苗。
Cellular immune response to combined DNA-protein constructs carrying SARS-CoV-2 antigens
BACKGROUND: One approach that makes it possible to create vaccines relatively quickly and inexpensively is the creation of DNA vaccine constructs. They are of particular interest for the prevention of COVID-19, as they induce both types of immune response humoral and T cell. Previously, we have created two DNA vaccines based on the pVAX vector: one encodes the full gene of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the second only encodes the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Next, the naked DNA was wrapped in a polycationic polyglucin-spermidine complex conjugated with the RBD protein. The resulting combined DNA-protein constructs were named CCV-RBD and CCV-S, respectively.
AIM: To investigate the induction of the T cell immune response of the developed combined DNA protein candidate vaccines in an animal model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BALB/c mice were immunized with constructs CCV-RBD and CCV-S, after which their spleens were removed from which splenocytes were isolated. The cellular response was assessed by the ability of splenocytes to secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides. The intensity of the response was recorded using the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) method using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: BALB/c mice were immunized twice with an interval of three weeks with a dose of 100 g of DNA (8 animals per group): 1) CCV-RBD 2) CCV-S and 3) intact animals. It has been shown that both T helper lymphocytes (CD4+) and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD8+) of animals immunized with CCV-S and CCV-RBD respond with the release of cytokines in response to stimulation with viral peptides.
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of CCV-RBD, a trend towards a higher response in both CD4+ and CD8+ was observed compared to the CCV-S group. Possibly, this difference may be due to more efficient synthesis of the RBD protein than the S protein, providing a DNA vaccine.