国内与国际投资法律与政策交界的国家安全演变:中国的角色

Lizzie Knight, Tania Voon
{"title":"国内与国际投资法律与政策交界的国家安全演变:中国的角色","authors":"Lizzie Knight, Tania Voon","doi":"10.1163/22119000-12340169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As China’s economy grows and the global economy is increasingly digitalised, the concept of national security is taking on increasing significance. Contrary to its quiet history, the security exception has now been invoked by different parties in ongoing disputes at the World Trade Organization. Similar exceptions exist in many international investment agreements and lie at the core of domestic jurisdictions’ regulatory frameworks for reviewing foreign investments. At the domestic level, these reviews have shifted to focus particularly on China and on a new category of ‘data’. Continued expansion of the meaning of security as a basis for rejecting foreign investment applications poses a threat to the benefits of economic integration, while allowing international tribunals to review these decisions by ruling on the meaning of this exception is likely to be counterproductive. Alternatives exist at the domestic and international levels. Domestically, a focus on evidence-based assessments and the imposition of behavioural or structural conditions as an alternative to rejecting foreign investment applications may help to mitigate security concerns. International guidelines and principles are already established to assist investors and investment agencies in this regard. Further rule reform at the international level may allow a more specific focus on agreed solutions to data concerns in place of a general acceptance of security as a catch-all response to perceived threats of foreign investment.","PeriodicalId":343950,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of National Security at the Interface between Domestic and International Investment Law and Policy: The Role of China\",\"authors\":\"Lizzie Knight, Tania Voon\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22119000-12340169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As China’s economy grows and the global economy is increasingly digitalised, the concept of national security is taking on increasing significance. Contrary to its quiet history, the security exception has now been invoked by different parties in ongoing disputes at the World Trade Organization. Similar exceptions exist in many international investment agreements and lie at the core of domestic jurisdictions’ regulatory frameworks for reviewing foreign investments. At the domestic level, these reviews have shifted to focus particularly on China and on a new category of ‘data’. Continued expansion of the meaning of security as a basis for rejecting foreign investment applications poses a threat to the benefits of economic integration, while allowing international tribunals to review these decisions by ruling on the meaning of this exception is likely to be counterproductive. Alternatives exist at the domestic and international levels. Domestically, a focus on evidence-based assessments and the imposition of behavioural or structural conditions as an alternative to rejecting foreign investment applications may help to mitigate security concerns. International guidelines and principles are already established to assist investors and investment agencies in this regard. Further rule reform at the international level may allow a more specific focus on agreed solutions to data concerns in place of a general acceptance of security as a catch-all response to perceived threats of foreign investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal\",\"volume\":\"184 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着中国经济的发展和全球经济的日益数字化,国家安全的概念越来越重要。与它平静的历史相反,安全例外现在被世界贸易组织(wto)正在进行的争端的不同各方援引。在许多国际投资协定中也存在类似的例外情况,这些例外情况是国内司法管辖区审查外国投资的监管框架的核心。在国内层面,这些评论已经转向特别关注中国和一个新的“数据”类别。继续扩大安全的含义作为拒绝外国投资申请的基础,对经济一体化的利益构成威胁,而允许国际法庭通过对这一例外的含义作出裁决来审查这些决定很可能适得其反。在国内和国际两级都存在备选方案。在国内,侧重于基于证据的评估,并强加行为或结构条件,作为拒绝外国投资申请的替代方案,可能有助于缓解安全担忧。已经制定了国际准则和原则,以便在这方面协助投资者和投资机构。在国际一级进一步改革规则,可以更具体地侧重于商定数据问题的解决办法,而不是普遍接受将安全作为对外国投资威胁的全面反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of National Security at the Interface between Domestic and International Investment Law and Policy: The Role of China
As China’s economy grows and the global economy is increasingly digitalised, the concept of national security is taking on increasing significance. Contrary to its quiet history, the security exception has now been invoked by different parties in ongoing disputes at the World Trade Organization. Similar exceptions exist in many international investment agreements and lie at the core of domestic jurisdictions’ regulatory frameworks for reviewing foreign investments. At the domestic level, these reviews have shifted to focus particularly on China and on a new category of ‘data’. Continued expansion of the meaning of security as a basis for rejecting foreign investment applications poses a threat to the benefits of economic integration, while allowing international tribunals to review these decisions by ruling on the meaning of this exception is likely to be counterproductive. Alternatives exist at the domestic and international levels. Domestically, a focus on evidence-based assessments and the imposition of behavioural or structural conditions as an alternative to rejecting foreign investment applications may help to mitigate security concerns. International guidelines and principles are already established to assist investors and investment agencies in this regard. Further rule reform at the international level may allow a more specific focus on agreed solutions to data concerns in place of a general acceptance of security as a catch-all response to perceived threats of foreign investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信