尼日利亚翁多州ose地方政府区两个流行社区黑蝇的叮咬偏好

O. Afolabi
{"title":"尼日利亚翁多州ose地方政府区两个流行社区黑蝇的叮咬偏好","authors":"O. Afolabi","doi":"10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_38_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Blackflies are hematophagous dipterans who transmit Onchocerca volvulus; the pathogen of onchocerciasis. Aims: The study was undertaken in Imeri and Idogun to evaluate the knowledge of respondents on the biting preferences of blackflies. Settings and Design: The design is an observational study in epidemiology which involves the use of structured questionnaire to obtain useful epidemiological information from the respondents. Materials and Methods: Structured questionnaire was administered during personal interview and focus group discussion to obtain useful epidemiological information. Statistical Analysis Used: Data obtained were analyzed using Carl Pearson Chi-square at P < 0.05 level of significance. Results: The results showed that only 193 of the 578 respondents interviewed in the two communities had adequate knowledge of the cause and mode of transmission of onchocerciasis. This group knew that the disease is transmitted by the bite of infected blackflies. Other respondents (66.6%) had wrong perception about the cause and mode of transmission of the disease. The wrong perceptions observed in the communities include transmission by sexual intercourse, stepping on charms, and transmission from infected parent to offspring. The knowledge on the biting preference of the blackflies as tested among 193 respondents that were knowledgeable about the disease varied significantly (P = 0.05). Some respondents believed the fly bites in the farm (48.7%) and others believed the fly bites by the riverside (36.3%), in the village (5.2%), whereas 9.8% of the respondents believed the fly bites both on the farm and the riverside. Similarly, others believed the fly bites on the exposed legs (54.4%), hands (9.9%), and face (6.7%). Meanwhile, 29% of respondents believed the fly bites on any exposed part of the body. Conclusions: The results revealed that ignorance on the bioecology of the vector is still very high in these communities.","PeriodicalId":261902,"journal":{"name":"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biting preferences of blackfly in two endemic communities of ose local government area, Ondo state, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"O. Afolabi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_38_18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Blackflies are hematophagous dipterans who transmit Onchocerca volvulus; the pathogen of onchocerciasis. Aims: The study was undertaken in Imeri and Idogun to evaluate the knowledge of respondents on the biting preferences of blackflies. Settings and Design: The design is an observational study in epidemiology which involves the use of structured questionnaire to obtain useful epidemiological information from the respondents. Materials and Methods: Structured questionnaire was administered during personal interview and focus group discussion to obtain useful epidemiological information. Statistical Analysis Used: Data obtained were analyzed using Carl Pearson Chi-square at P < 0.05 level of significance. Results: The results showed that only 193 of the 578 respondents interviewed in the two communities had adequate knowledge of the cause and mode of transmission of onchocerciasis. This group knew that the disease is transmitted by the bite of infected blackflies. Other respondents (66.6%) had wrong perception about the cause and mode of transmission of the disease. The wrong perceptions observed in the communities include transmission by sexual intercourse, stepping on charms, and transmission from infected parent to offspring. The knowledge on the biting preference of the blackflies as tested among 193 respondents that were knowledgeable about the disease varied significantly (P = 0.05). Some respondents believed the fly bites in the farm (48.7%) and others believed the fly bites by the riverside (36.3%), in the village (5.2%), whereas 9.8% of the respondents believed the fly bites both on the farm and the riverside. Similarly, others believed the fly bites on the exposed legs (54.4%), hands (9.9%), and face (6.7%). Meanwhile, 29% of respondents believed the fly bites on any exposed part of the body. Conclusions: The results revealed that ignorance on the bioecology of the vector is still very high in these communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_38_18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nnjcr.nnjcr_38_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑蝇是吸血的双翅目动物,传播盘尾丝虫;盘尾丝虫病的病原体目的:本研究在伊默里和爱达荷州进行,以评估受访者对黑蝇叮咬偏好的了解。背景和设计:本设计是一项流行病学观察性研究,使用结构化问卷从调查对象处获取有用的流行病学信息。材料与方法:通过个人访谈和焦点小组讨论,采用结构化问卷调查法获取有用的流行病学信息。统计学分析使用:所得资料采用卡尔·皮尔逊卡方分析,P < 0.05显著水平。结果:在两个社区的578名调查对象中,仅有193人对盘尾丝虫病的病因和传播方式有充分的了解。这个小组知道这种疾病是由受感染的黑蝇叮咬传播的。其他应答者(66.6%)对该病的病因和传播方式有错误认识。在社区中观察到的错误观念包括通过性交传播、踩到护身符以及从受感染的父母传染给后代。193名调查对象对黑蝇叮咬偏好的了解程度差异有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。有48.7%的人认为蝇叮咬是在农场,36.3%的人认为蝇叮咬是在河边,5.2%的人认为蝇叮咬是在村庄,9.8%的人认为蝇叮咬是在农场和河边。同样,其他人认为苍蝇叮咬暴露的腿(54.4%),手(9.9%)和脸(6.7%)。同时,29%的受访者认为苍蝇会叮咬身体任何暴露的部位。结论:调查结果表明,该地区对病媒生物生态学的无知程度仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biting preferences of blackfly in two endemic communities of ose local government area, Ondo state, Nigeria
Context: Blackflies are hematophagous dipterans who transmit Onchocerca volvulus; the pathogen of onchocerciasis. Aims: The study was undertaken in Imeri and Idogun to evaluate the knowledge of respondents on the biting preferences of blackflies. Settings and Design: The design is an observational study in epidemiology which involves the use of structured questionnaire to obtain useful epidemiological information from the respondents. Materials and Methods: Structured questionnaire was administered during personal interview and focus group discussion to obtain useful epidemiological information. Statistical Analysis Used: Data obtained were analyzed using Carl Pearson Chi-square at P < 0.05 level of significance. Results: The results showed that only 193 of the 578 respondents interviewed in the two communities had adequate knowledge of the cause and mode of transmission of onchocerciasis. This group knew that the disease is transmitted by the bite of infected blackflies. Other respondents (66.6%) had wrong perception about the cause and mode of transmission of the disease. The wrong perceptions observed in the communities include transmission by sexual intercourse, stepping on charms, and transmission from infected parent to offspring. The knowledge on the biting preference of the blackflies as tested among 193 respondents that were knowledgeable about the disease varied significantly (P = 0.05). Some respondents believed the fly bites in the farm (48.7%) and others believed the fly bites by the riverside (36.3%), in the village (5.2%), whereas 9.8% of the respondents believed the fly bites both on the farm and the riverside. Similarly, others believed the fly bites on the exposed legs (54.4%), hands (9.9%), and face (6.7%). Meanwhile, 29% of respondents believed the fly bites on any exposed part of the body. Conclusions: The results revealed that ignorance on the bioecology of the vector is still very high in these communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信