{"title":"TFEU第101(1)条的“目的”和“效果”限制","authors":"Nathan Tsormetsri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2596940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an assessment of the distinction between the \"Object\" and \"Effect\" restriction of Article 101(1) TFEU and their implementation in case-law of the CJEU. The paper critically examines both concepts and the resulting consequences emanating from how the CJEU has so far interpreted the \"object\" and \"effect\" restriction concept in case-law. It further provides possible paths to adopt so as to eradicate or minimize the problem.","PeriodicalId":231496,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'Object' and 'Effect' Restriction of Article 101(1) TFEU\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Tsormetsri\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2596940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is an assessment of the distinction between the \\\"Object\\\" and \\\"Effect\\\" restriction of Article 101(1) TFEU and their implementation in case-law of the CJEU. The paper critically examines both concepts and the resulting consequences emanating from how the CJEU has so far interpreted the \\\"object\\\" and \\\"effect\\\" restriction concept in case-law. It further provides possible paths to adopt so as to eradicate or minimize the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2596940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2596940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 'Object' and 'Effect' Restriction of Article 101(1) TFEU
This paper is an assessment of the distinction between the "Object" and "Effect" restriction of Article 101(1) TFEU and their implementation in case-law of the CJEU. The paper critically examines both concepts and the resulting consequences emanating from how the CJEU has so far interpreted the "object" and "effect" restriction concept in case-law. It further provides possible paths to adopt so as to eradicate or minimize the problem.