日本与欧盟相互充分性承认的实现及过程中产生的问题

M. Horibe
{"title":"日本与欧盟相互充分性承认的实现及过程中产生的问题","authors":"M. Horibe","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 23 January 2019, the safe and smooth transborder transfer of personal data was realized between Japan and the European Union (EU). This mutual adequacy decision was the first in the world, and Japan was the first to be certified under Article 45 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The EU and European Economic Area (EEA) (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) were also the first in the world to be certified by Japan under Article 24 of the 2015 Amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI). It is the first mutual adequacy decision in the world and in the history of data protection.\nThe PPC’s dialogue and cooperation with the European Commission started in 2016 and further dialogue continued in 2017. In the first half of 2018, two important issues were raised. One was how to bridge differences between two systems, and the other was how to deal with access and use of personal data transferred from the EU by public authorities in Japan. The APPI only covers the private sector and the PPC does not deal with the handling of personal data by public authorities. These solutions are explained in the article.\nadequacy decision, mutual recognition, cross-border data flows, independent institution, Personal Information Protection Act, Waseda University, Benesse Data Breach","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Realization of Mutual Adequacy Recognition Between Japan and the EU and Issues Raised in the Process\",\"authors\":\"M. Horibe\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gplr2020091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 23 January 2019, the safe and smooth transborder transfer of personal data was realized between Japan and the European Union (EU). This mutual adequacy decision was the first in the world, and Japan was the first to be certified under Article 45 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The EU and European Economic Area (EEA) (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) were also the first in the world to be certified by Japan under Article 24 of the 2015 Amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI). It is the first mutual adequacy decision in the world and in the history of data protection.\\nThe PPC’s dialogue and cooperation with the European Commission started in 2016 and further dialogue continued in 2017. In the first half of 2018, two important issues were raised. One was how to bridge differences between two systems, and the other was how to deal with access and use of personal data transferred from the EU by public authorities in Japan. The APPI only covers the private sector and the PPC does not deal with the handling of personal data by public authorities. These solutions are explained in the article.\\nadequacy decision, mutual recognition, cross-border data flows, independent institution, Personal Information Protection Act, Waseda University, Benesse Data Breach\",\"PeriodicalId\":127582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年1月23日,日本与欧盟(EU)之间实现了安全和顺利的个人数据跨境转移。这是世界上第一个相互充分性的决定,日本是第一个根据通用数据保护条例(GDPR)第45条获得认证的国家。欧盟和欧洲经济区(EEA)(冰岛、列支敦士登和挪威)也是世界上第一个根据2015年修订的《个人信息保护法》(APPI)第24条获得日本认证的国家。这是世界上和数据保护史上第一个相互充分性的决定。PPC与欧盟委员会的对话与合作始于2016年,并于2017年继续进行进一步对话。2018年上半年,人们提出了两个重要问题。一个是如何弥合两个系统之间的差异,另一个是如何处理日本公共当局从欧盟转移的个人数据的访问和使用。《个人资料保护条例》只涵盖私营机构,而《个人资料保护条例》并不涉及公共当局对个人资料的处理。本文将对这些解决方案进行解释。充分性决策、互认、跨境数据流、独立机构、个人信息保护法、早稻田大学、Benesse数据泄露
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Realization of Mutual Adequacy Recognition Between Japan and the EU and Issues Raised in the Process
On 23 January 2019, the safe and smooth transborder transfer of personal data was realized between Japan and the European Union (EU). This mutual adequacy decision was the first in the world, and Japan was the first to be certified under Article 45 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The EU and European Economic Area (EEA) (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) were also the first in the world to be certified by Japan under Article 24 of the 2015 Amended Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI). It is the first mutual adequacy decision in the world and in the history of data protection. The PPC’s dialogue and cooperation with the European Commission started in 2016 and further dialogue continued in 2017. In the first half of 2018, two important issues were raised. One was how to bridge differences between two systems, and the other was how to deal with access and use of personal data transferred from the EU by public authorities in Japan. The APPI only covers the private sector and the PPC does not deal with the handling of personal data by public authorities. These solutions are explained in the article. adequacy decision, mutual recognition, cross-border data flows, independent institution, Personal Information Protection Act, Waseda University, Benesse Data Breach
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信