六种图像质量评价方法的试验

Tomasz Grzywalski, R. Stasinski
{"title":"六种图像质量评价方法的试验","authors":"Tomasz Grzywalski, R. Stasinski","doi":"10.1109/IWSSIP.2015.7313930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper results of an subjective image quality assessment experiment based on Internet poll are used for testing six automatic image quality assessment methods. It is shown that while the methods deal fairly well with global distortions, they usually fail in score evaluation for local and geometric deformations. On the other hand, visibility of local and geometric distortions depends on image content, which is not taken into account when defining objective quality assessment methods.","PeriodicalId":249021,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test of six image quality assessment methods\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Grzywalski, R. Stasinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWSSIP.2015.7313930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper results of an subjective image quality assessment experiment based on Internet poll are used for testing six automatic image quality assessment methods. It is shown that while the methods deal fairly well with global distortions, they usually fail in score evaluation for local and geometric deformations. On the other hand, visibility of local and geometric distortions depends on image content, which is not taken into account when defining objective quality assessment methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP.2015.7313930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP.2015.7313930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用基于网络民意调查的主观图像质量评价实验结果,对6种图像质量自动评价方法进行了测试。结果表明,虽然这些方法能很好地处理全局变形,但它们在局部和几何变形的评分评估中往往失败。另一方面,局部和几何畸变的可见性取决于图像内容,在定义客观质量评估方法时没有考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test of six image quality assessment methods
In the paper results of an subjective image quality assessment experiment based on Internet poll are used for testing six automatic image quality assessment methods. It is shown that while the methods deal fairly well with global distortions, they usually fail in score evaluation for local and geometric deformations. On the other hand, visibility of local and geometric distortions depends on image content, which is not taken into account when defining objective quality assessment methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信