电子临床数据管理绩效的探索性评估框架

Hyunju Lee, Sangwon Lee
{"title":"电子临床数据管理绩效的探索性评估框架","authors":"Hyunju Lee, Sangwon Lee","doi":"10.1177/0092861512452119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic data management is becoming important to reduce the overall cost and run-time of clinical trials with enhanced data quality. It is also imperative to meet regulated guidelines for the overall quality and safety of electronic clinical trials. The purpose of this paper is to develop an exploratory performance evaluation framework for e-clinical data management. This study performs a Delphi survey for 3 iterative rounds to develop an exploratory framework based on key informants’ knowledge. Four key metrics in the areas of infrastructure, intellectual preparation, study implementation, and study completion covering major aspects of clinical trial processes are proposed. Performance measures evaluate the extent of regulation compliance, data quality, cost, and efficiency of the electronic data management process. They also provide measurement indicators for each evaluation item. Based on the key metrics, the performance evaluation framework is developed in three major areas involved in clinical data management—clinical site, monitoring, and data coordinating center. From this initial attempt to evaluate the extent of electronic data management in clinical trials by a Delphi survey, further empirical studies are planned and recommended.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Evaluation Framework for e-Clinical Data Management Performance\",\"authors\":\"Hyunju Lee, Sangwon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0092861512452119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electronic data management is becoming important to reduce the overall cost and run-time of clinical trials with enhanced data quality. It is also imperative to meet regulated guidelines for the overall quality and safety of electronic clinical trials. The purpose of this paper is to develop an exploratory performance evaluation framework for e-clinical data management. This study performs a Delphi survey for 3 iterative rounds to develop an exploratory framework based on key informants’ knowledge. Four key metrics in the areas of infrastructure, intellectual preparation, study implementation, and study completion covering major aspects of clinical trial processes are proposed. Performance measures evaluate the extent of regulation compliance, data quality, cost, and efficiency of the electronic data management process. They also provide measurement indicators for each evaluation item. Based on the key metrics, the performance evaluation framework is developed in three major areas involved in clinical data management—clinical site, monitoring, and data coordinating center. From this initial attempt to evaluate the extent of electronic data management in clinical trials by a Delphi survey, further empirical studies are planned and recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512452119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512452119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电子数据管理对于降低临床试验的总体成本和运行时间以及提高数据质量变得越来越重要。满足电子临床试验的整体质量和安全性的规范指南也是势在必行的。本文的目的是为电子临床数据管理开发一个探索性的绩效评估框架。本研究进行了三次迭代的德尔菲调查,以开发基于关键举报人知识的探索性框架。提出了基础设施、智力准备、研究实施和研究完成方面的四个关键指标,涵盖临床试验过程的主要方面。性能度量评估法规遵从的程度、数据质量、成本和电子数据管理流程的效率。它们还为每个评价项目提供了度量指标。基于关键指标,在临床数据管理涉及的临床现场、监测和数据协调中心三个主要领域开发了绩效评估框架。通过德尔菲调查评估临床试验中电子数据管理程度的初步尝试,计划并建议进一步的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Exploratory Evaluation Framework for e-Clinical Data Management Performance
Electronic data management is becoming important to reduce the overall cost and run-time of clinical trials with enhanced data quality. It is also imperative to meet regulated guidelines for the overall quality and safety of electronic clinical trials. The purpose of this paper is to develop an exploratory performance evaluation framework for e-clinical data management. This study performs a Delphi survey for 3 iterative rounds to develop an exploratory framework based on key informants’ knowledge. Four key metrics in the areas of infrastructure, intellectual preparation, study implementation, and study completion covering major aspects of clinical trial processes are proposed. Performance measures evaluate the extent of regulation compliance, data quality, cost, and efficiency of the electronic data management process. They also provide measurement indicators for each evaluation item. Based on the key metrics, the performance evaluation framework is developed in three major areas involved in clinical data management—clinical site, monitoring, and data coordinating center. From this initial attempt to evaluate the extent of electronic data management in clinical trials by a Delphi survey, further empirical studies are planned and recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信