Annabeth Aque, Manuel B. Barquilla, A. Buan, J. Bagaloyos
{"title":"非同步学习:对学习成绩和学生科学学习动机的影响","authors":"Annabeth Aque, Manuel B. Barquilla, A. Buan, J. Bagaloyos","doi":"10.21043/THABIEA.V4I1.9806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of the study is to determine the effect of asynchronous learning to academic performance and students’ motivation towards Science. It is necessary since motivation serves as a foundation for better understanding of science concepts in an asynchronous setting. The respondents are 201 grade 11 students of Iligan Computer Institute (ICI) who are enrolled during the Academic Year 2020-2021. The ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model was used in the study for the development of asynchronous lesson on Genetic Engineering with Google Classroom as the online platform. The research utilized SMTSL (Students Motivation Towards Science Learning) questionnaire developed by Tuan, et al. (2005) composed of 35 questions encompassing six (6) domains of motivation namely, self-efficacy, active learning strategies, science learning value, performance goal, achievement goal and learning environment stimulation. Quantitative data together with qualitative analysis showed that students are moderately motivated towards science learning in an asynchronous environment. The highest identified domain is science learning value indicating that students find the relevance of science with daily life which makes them motivated to learn science even in a remote learning environment where there is no direct contact and supervision. In contrast, self-efficacy and performance goal are the least domains suggesting that students are least concerned with their own ability to perform well in science learning tasks and they do not compete with other students and get attention from the teacher. Using the researcher-made achievement test and performance task to measure their academic performance, 80% of the students belong to approaching proficiency, proficient and advanced groups showing that students did well in science in an asynchronous learning environment. Moreover, students’ motivation was significantly correlated with science academic performance so science academic performance can be used as indirect evidence of students’ motivation. Based on these findings, it is recommended that curriculum experts and educators consider factors of motivation in revisiting the science curriculum in an asynchronous environment.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asynchronous Learning: Its Effects on Academic Performance and Students’ Motivation In Science\",\"authors\":\"Annabeth Aque, Manuel B. Barquilla, A. Buan, J. Bagaloyos\",\"doi\":\"10.21043/THABIEA.V4I1.9806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of the study is to determine the effect of asynchronous learning to academic performance and students’ motivation towards Science. It is necessary since motivation serves as a foundation for better understanding of science concepts in an asynchronous setting. The respondents are 201 grade 11 students of Iligan Computer Institute (ICI) who are enrolled during the Academic Year 2020-2021. The ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model was used in the study for the development of asynchronous lesson on Genetic Engineering with Google Classroom as the online platform. The research utilized SMTSL (Students Motivation Towards Science Learning) questionnaire developed by Tuan, et al. (2005) composed of 35 questions encompassing six (6) domains of motivation namely, self-efficacy, active learning strategies, science learning value, performance goal, achievement goal and learning environment stimulation. Quantitative data together with qualitative analysis showed that students are moderately motivated towards science learning in an asynchronous environment. The highest identified domain is science learning value indicating that students find the relevance of science with daily life which makes them motivated to learn science even in a remote learning environment where there is no direct contact and supervision. In contrast, self-efficacy and performance goal are the least domains suggesting that students are least concerned with their own ability to perform well in science learning tasks and they do not compete with other students and get attention from the teacher. Using the researcher-made achievement test and performance task to measure their academic performance, 80% of the students belong to approaching proficiency, proficient and advanced groups showing that students did well in science in an asynchronous learning environment. Moreover, students’ motivation was significantly correlated with science academic performance so science academic performance can be used as indirect evidence of students’ motivation. Based on these findings, it is recommended that curriculum experts and educators consider factors of motivation in revisiting the science curriculum in an asynchronous environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21043/THABIEA.V4I1.9806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/THABIEA.V4I1.9806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
本研究的主要目的是确定异步学习对学习成绩和学生学习科学动机的影响。这是必要的,因为动机是在异步环境中更好地理解科学概念的基础。受访者是2020-2021学年入学的伊利根计算机学院(ICI) 11年级201名学生。本研究采用ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation)模型,以Google Classroom为在线平台开发基因工程异步课程。本研究采用Tuan等(2005)开发的SMTSL (student Motivation Towards Science Learning)问卷,问卷共35个问题,涵盖了自我效能感、主动学习策略、科学学习价值、绩效目标、成就目标和学习环境激励6个动机领域。定量数据和定性分析表明,在异步环境中,学生对科学学习有适度的动机。识别度最高的领域是科学学习价值,这表明学生发现科学与日常生活的相关性,这使得他们即使在没有直接接触和监督的远程学习环境中也有动力学习科学。相比之下,自我效能感和表现目标是最少的领域,这表明学生最不关心自己在科学学习任务中表现良好的能力,他们不与其他学生竞争,也不得到老师的关注。采用自制的成绩测试和绩效任务来衡量学生的学业成绩,80%的学生属于接近熟练、熟练和高级组,表明学生在异步学习环境中取得了较好的科学成绩。此外,学生的动机与科学学业成绩显著相关,因此科学学业成绩可以作为学生动机的间接证据。基于这些发现,建议课程专家和教育工作者考虑在异步环境中重新访问科学课程的动机因素。
Asynchronous Learning: Its Effects on Academic Performance and Students’ Motivation In Science
The main purpose of the study is to determine the effect of asynchronous learning to academic performance and students’ motivation towards Science. It is necessary since motivation serves as a foundation for better understanding of science concepts in an asynchronous setting. The respondents are 201 grade 11 students of Iligan Computer Institute (ICI) who are enrolled during the Academic Year 2020-2021. The ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model was used in the study for the development of asynchronous lesson on Genetic Engineering with Google Classroom as the online platform. The research utilized SMTSL (Students Motivation Towards Science Learning) questionnaire developed by Tuan, et al. (2005) composed of 35 questions encompassing six (6) domains of motivation namely, self-efficacy, active learning strategies, science learning value, performance goal, achievement goal and learning environment stimulation. Quantitative data together with qualitative analysis showed that students are moderately motivated towards science learning in an asynchronous environment. The highest identified domain is science learning value indicating that students find the relevance of science with daily life which makes them motivated to learn science even in a remote learning environment where there is no direct contact and supervision. In contrast, self-efficacy and performance goal are the least domains suggesting that students are least concerned with their own ability to perform well in science learning tasks and they do not compete with other students and get attention from the teacher. Using the researcher-made achievement test and performance task to measure their academic performance, 80% of the students belong to approaching proficiency, proficient and advanced groups showing that students did well in science in an asynchronous learning environment. Moreover, students’ motivation was significantly correlated with science academic performance so science academic performance can be used as indirect evidence of students’ motivation. Based on these findings, it is recommended that curriculum experts and educators consider factors of motivation in revisiting the science curriculum in an asynchronous environment.