文化史、科学研究和全球经济:新的和未来的方法

L. Meneghello
{"title":"文化史、科学研究和全球经济:新的和未来的方法","authors":"L. Meneghello","doi":"10.1515/9783110669398-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We can now see with sufficient distinctiveness the two great facts which afford a complete refutation of Malthusianism. The first is, that the limit of Population, in any country whatever, is not the number of people which the soil of that country alone will supply with food, but the number which the surface of the whole earth is capable of feeding; and it is a matter of demonstration, that this limit cannot even be approached for many centuries. The inability of England alone, or of Ireland alone, to supply her teeming population with food, is a fact of no more importance in the world’s economy , than the inability of the city of London alone to supply her two millions of people with farm-produce from her own soil. London taxes all the counties of England for her sustenance; England taxes all the countries of the world for her sustenance; – I cannot see any difference between the two cases. (Bowen 1870, 140, emphasis mine, italics in the original)","PeriodicalId":447488,"journal":{"name":"Futures of the Study of Culture","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural History, Science Studies, and Global Economy: New and Future Approaches\",\"authors\":\"L. Meneghello\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110669398-015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We can now see with sufficient distinctiveness the two great facts which afford a complete refutation of Malthusianism. The first is, that the limit of Population, in any country whatever, is not the number of people which the soil of that country alone will supply with food, but the number which the surface of the whole earth is capable of feeding; and it is a matter of demonstration, that this limit cannot even be approached for many centuries. The inability of England alone, or of Ireland alone, to supply her teeming population with food, is a fact of no more importance in the world’s economy , than the inability of the city of London alone to supply her two millions of people with farm-produce from her own soil. London taxes all the counties of England for her sustenance; England taxes all the countries of the world for her sustenance; – I cannot see any difference between the two cases. (Bowen 1870, 140, emphasis mine, italics in the original)\",\"PeriodicalId\":447488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures of the Study of Culture\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures of the Study of Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669398-015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures of the Study of Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669398-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们现在可以清楚地看到,有两大事实可以完全驳倒马尔萨斯主义。第一,无论在哪个国家,人口的极限不是该国的土壤能够提供食物的人数,而是整个地球表面能够养活的人数;这是一个证明的问题,这个极限甚至在许多世纪内都无法接近。在世界经济中,单是英格兰或爱尔兰无力为其庞大的人口提供食物,这一事实并不比单是伦敦城无力为其200万人口提供本土农产品更为重要。伦敦向英国所有郡征税以维持生计;英国向世界各国征税以维持生计;我看不出这两种情况有什么区别。(Bowen, 1870, 140,原文斜体)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural History, Science Studies, and Global Economy: New and Future Approaches
We can now see with sufficient distinctiveness the two great facts which afford a complete refutation of Malthusianism. The first is, that the limit of Population, in any country whatever, is not the number of people which the soil of that country alone will supply with food, but the number which the surface of the whole earth is capable of feeding; and it is a matter of demonstration, that this limit cannot even be approached for many centuries. The inability of England alone, or of Ireland alone, to supply her teeming population with food, is a fact of no more importance in the world’s economy , than the inability of the city of London alone to supply her two millions of people with farm-produce from her own soil. London taxes all the counties of England for her sustenance; England taxes all the countries of the world for her sustenance; – I cannot see any difference between the two cases. (Bowen 1870, 140, emphasis mine, italics in the original)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信