种群水平外显子变异频率数据的统计建模,重点是罕见变异

Yining Shi, S. Bull
{"title":"种群水平外显子变异频率数据的统计建模,重点是罕见变异","authors":"Yining Shi, S. Bull","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objective: Rare variants with allele frequency smaller than 1% are postulated to be associated with disease susceptibility. Since allele frequencies vary globally, the use of population control data that does not match the study population can produce bias. The research question is to identify factors that explain variation in allele frequency across populations. The secondary question is to evaluate the potential bias in using population as control data when studying variants. We use data from gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) to answer these questions. \nMethods: We apply each of three model formulations: Linear, Logistic, and Poisson to explain how the frequency or count of variants depends on population subgroup/ancestry, functional annotation, sex, and disease status. We also evaluate interactions between population subgroups and functional annotation. \nResults: For very rare variants (allele frequency < 0.1%), likelihood ratio testing (LRT) provides evidence that allele frequencies vary with functional annotation and population in all three model formulations. By LRT, interactions of population and functional annotation are significant in the Logistic model and the Poisson model. The goodness-of-fit statistics show a better fit in the linear model compared to low frequency variants. \nConclusion: We observe that population & functional annotation affect variant frequencies, and conclude that detection of differences across populations and annotations is model scale-dependent, especially for different degrees of rareness. Therefore, statisticians need to carefully consider the potential for bias when using gnomAD as control data. Moreover, gnomAD is a great resource for studies dealing with rare variants.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Modelling of Population-Level Exonic Variant Frequency Data with an Emphasis on Rare Variants\",\"authors\":\"Yining Shi, S. Bull\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction & Objective: Rare variants with allele frequency smaller than 1% are postulated to be associated with disease susceptibility. Since allele frequencies vary globally, the use of population control data that does not match the study population can produce bias. The research question is to identify factors that explain variation in allele frequency across populations. The secondary question is to evaluate the potential bias in using population as control data when studying variants. We use data from gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) to answer these questions. \\nMethods: We apply each of three model formulations: Linear, Logistic, and Poisson to explain how the frequency or count of variants depends on population subgroup/ancestry, functional annotation, sex, and disease status. We also evaluate interactions between population subgroups and functional annotation. \\nResults: For very rare variants (allele frequency < 0.1%), likelihood ratio testing (LRT) provides evidence that allele frequencies vary with functional annotation and population in all three model formulations. By LRT, interactions of population and functional annotation are significant in the Logistic model and the Poisson model. The goodness-of-fit statistics show a better fit in the linear model compared to low frequency variants. \\nConclusion: We observe that population & functional annotation affect variant frequencies, and conclude that detection of differences across populations and annotations is model scale-dependent, especially for different degrees of rareness. Therefore, statisticians need to carefully consider the potential for bias when using gnomAD as control data. Moreover, gnomAD is a great resource for studies dealing with rare variants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言与目的:等位基因频率小于1%的罕见变异被认为与疾病易感性相关。由于等位基因频率在全球范围内存在差异,因此使用与研究人群不匹配的人口控制数据可能会产生偏差。研究的问题是找出解释人群中等位基因频率变化的因素。第二个问题是评估在研究变异时使用群体作为控制数据的潜在偏差。我们使用来自gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database)的数据来回答这些问题。方法:我们应用三种模型公式中的每一种:线性、Logistic和泊松来解释变异的频率或计数如何取决于种群亚群/祖先、功能注释、性别和疾病状态。我们还评估了人口子群和功能注释之间的相互作用。结果:对于非常罕见的变异(等位基因频率< 0.1%),似然比检验(LRT)提供了证据,证明等位基因频率在所有三种模型公式中随功能注释和群体而变化。通过LRT,在Logistic模型和泊松模型中,种群和功能注释的相互作用是显著的。拟合优度统计表明,与低频变量相比,线性模型的拟合效果更好。结论:我们观察到种群和功能注释影响变异频率,并得出结论,种群和注释之间的差异检测依赖于模型尺度,特别是对于不同程度的稀缺性。因此,统计学家在使用gnomAD作为对照数据时需要仔细考虑潜在的偏差。此外,gnomAD是研究罕见变异的重要资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical Modelling of Population-Level Exonic Variant Frequency Data with an Emphasis on Rare Variants
Introduction & Objective: Rare variants with allele frequency smaller than 1% are postulated to be associated with disease susceptibility. Since allele frequencies vary globally, the use of population control data that does not match the study population can produce bias. The research question is to identify factors that explain variation in allele frequency across populations. The secondary question is to evaluate the potential bias in using population as control data when studying variants. We use data from gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) to answer these questions. Methods: We apply each of three model formulations: Linear, Logistic, and Poisson to explain how the frequency or count of variants depends on population subgroup/ancestry, functional annotation, sex, and disease status. We also evaluate interactions between population subgroups and functional annotation. Results: For very rare variants (allele frequency < 0.1%), likelihood ratio testing (LRT) provides evidence that allele frequencies vary with functional annotation and population in all three model formulations. By LRT, interactions of population and functional annotation are significant in the Logistic model and the Poisson model. The goodness-of-fit statistics show a better fit in the linear model compared to low frequency variants. Conclusion: We observe that population & functional annotation affect variant frequencies, and conclude that detection of differences across populations and annotations is model scale-dependent, especially for different degrees of rareness. Therefore, statisticians need to carefully consider the potential for bias when using gnomAD as control data. Moreover, gnomAD is a great resource for studies dealing with rare variants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信