上游石油项目注意义务的比较研究

Amin Ghanbari Amirhandeh
{"title":"上游石油项目注意义务的比较研究","authors":"Amin Ghanbari Amirhandeh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3755192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present memoire is a comparative study that tries to shed light on the notion of duty of care or as French say, devoir de vigilance of multinationals in their foreign direct investments; it draws a general doctrinal normative map of the duty of care and describes to what extent the two legal systems of France and the United Kingdom resemble or differ in their perspective towards this notion.<br><br>It explains that notion universally consists of two pillars (or sub-regimes): first the duty to conduct and maintain due diligence in order to address, mitigate and prevent risks of an investment project and second, the obligation to redress and amend damages if the endeavors of due diligence fail.<br><br>Doing that, it uses typical facts of an upstream petroleum project, as application of the notion of duty of care is, in many aspects, heavily fact-based, including in its assessment of the concept of control that plays a leading role in connecting default and liability of the operating entity and its principal (i.e. the multinational).","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Duty of Care (Devoir De Vigilance) in Upstream Petroleum Projects\",\"authors\":\"Amin Ghanbari Amirhandeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3755192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Present memoire is a comparative study that tries to shed light on the notion of duty of care or as French say, devoir de vigilance of multinationals in their foreign direct investments; it draws a general doctrinal normative map of the duty of care and describes to what extent the two legal systems of France and the United Kingdom resemble or differ in their perspective towards this notion.<br><br>It explains that notion universally consists of two pillars (or sub-regimes): first the duty to conduct and maintain due diligence in order to address, mitigate and prevent risks of an investment project and second, the obligation to redress and amend damages if the endeavors of due diligence fail.<br><br>Doing that, it uses typical facts of an upstream petroleum project, as application of the notion of duty of care is, in many aspects, heavily fact-based, including in its assessment of the concept of control that plays a leading role in connecting default and liability of the operating entity and its principal (i.e. the multinational).\",\"PeriodicalId\":255520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的回忆录是一项比较研究,试图阐明注意义务的概念,或者如法国人所说,跨国公司在其外国直接投资中的警惕义务;它绘制了关于注意义务的一般理论规范图,并描述了法国和联合王国的两个法律制度对这一概念的看法在何种程度上相似或不同。它解释说,这一概念普遍由两个支柱(或子制度)组成:第一,有义务进行和维持尽职调查,以解决、减轻和预防投资项目的风险;第二,如果尽职调查的努力失败,有义务纠正和修正损害。为了做到这一点,它使用了上游石油项目的典型事实,因为注意义务概念的应用在许多方面都是基于事实的,包括在对控制概念的评估中,控制概念在连接运营实体及其委托人(即跨国公司)的违约和责任方面起着主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Duty of Care (Devoir De Vigilance) in Upstream Petroleum Projects
Present memoire is a comparative study that tries to shed light on the notion of duty of care or as French say, devoir de vigilance of multinationals in their foreign direct investments; it draws a general doctrinal normative map of the duty of care and describes to what extent the two legal systems of France and the United Kingdom resemble or differ in their perspective towards this notion.

It explains that notion universally consists of two pillars (or sub-regimes): first the duty to conduct and maintain due diligence in order to address, mitigate and prevent risks of an investment project and second, the obligation to redress and amend damages if the endeavors of due diligence fail.

Doing that, it uses typical facts of an upstream petroleum project, as application of the notion of duty of care is, in many aspects, heavily fact-based, including in its assessment of the concept of control that plays a leading role in connecting default and liability of the operating entity and its principal (i.e. the multinational).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信