地方政府公共决策中的集体意见形成

Ye Tian, Guoray Cai
{"title":"地方政府公共决策中的集体意见形成","authors":"Ye Tian, Guoray Cai","doi":"10.1145/2912160.2912194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democratic decision making on public issues requires that a collective form of public opinion be constructed in order to be legitimate. However, elicitation of collective public opinion has been challenging due to conceptual and methodological difficulties as well as practical constraints. This paper revisits existing methods of civic engagement through the lens of structured public decision making, and reveals the disconnects between methods of public opinion and the need for establishing public value and solid decision analysis in democratic decision making. This explains why the current online deliberation systems fail to support formation of decision-relevant public opinions. Based on such understanding, we propose Community Opinion Elicitation (COPE) as a solution to public engagement in local government decision making. COPE envisions a three-phase process where opinions from the general public are elicited (Phase III) only after public values and solid decision analysis have been established (Phases I and II). In practice, COPE is implemented by extending traditional online deliberation with two small-group deliberations that address public value identification and decision analysis. This process has been deployed by State College municipal government as a formal method to engage the public. We report our findings from such field exercises and their implications to scaling up online deliberation for public decision making.","PeriodicalId":270321,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Opinion Formation for Public Decision Making in Local Governments\",\"authors\":\"Ye Tian, Guoray Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2912160.2912194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Democratic decision making on public issues requires that a collective form of public opinion be constructed in order to be legitimate. However, elicitation of collective public opinion has been challenging due to conceptual and methodological difficulties as well as practical constraints. This paper revisits existing methods of civic engagement through the lens of structured public decision making, and reveals the disconnects between methods of public opinion and the need for establishing public value and solid decision analysis in democratic decision making. This explains why the current online deliberation systems fail to support formation of decision-relevant public opinions. Based on such understanding, we propose Community Opinion Elicitation (COPE) as a solution to public engagement in local government decision making. COPE envisions a three-phase process where opinions from the general public are elicited (Phase III) only after public values and solid decision analysis have been established (Phases I and II). In practice, COPE is implemented by extending traditional online deliberation with two small-group deliberations that address public value identification and decision analysis. This process has been deployed by State College municipal government as a formal method to engage the public. We report our findings from such field exercises and their implications to scaling up online deliberation for public decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共问题的民主决策要求建立一种集体形式的公众意见,以使其合法。然而,由于概念和方法上的困难以及实际的限制,引起集体舆论一直具有挑战性。本文通过结构化公共决策的视角重新审视了现有的公民参与方法,并揭示了在民主决策中建立公共价值和可靠决策分析的需要与民意方法之间的脱节。这也解释了为什么目前的网络审议制度不能支持决策相关民意的形成。基于这样的认识,我们提出了社区意见征集(COPE)作为公众参与地方政府决策的解决方案。COPE设想了一个三阶段的过程,只有在公共价值和可靠的决策分析(第一阶段和第二阶段)建立之后,才会征求公众的意见(第三阶段)。在实践中,COPE通过扩展传统的在线审议,通过两个小组审议来解决公共价值识别和决策分析问题。这个过程已经被州立大学市政府作为一种正式的方法来吸引公众。我们报告了这些实地演习的发现,以及它们对扩大公共决策的在线审议的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Opinion Formation for Public Decision Making in Local Governments
Democratic decision making on public issues requires that a collective form of public opinion be constructed in order to be legitimate. However, elicitation of collective public opinion has been challenging due to conceptual and methodological difficulties as well as practical constraints. This paper revisits existing methods of civic engagement through the lens of structured public decision making, and reveals the disconnects between methods of public opinion and the need for establishing public value and solid decision analysis in democratic decision making. This explains why the current online deliberation systems fail to support formation of decision-relevant public opinions. Based on such understanding, we propose Community Opinion Elicitation (COPE) as a solution to public engagement in local government decision making. COPE envisions a three-phase process where opinions from the general public are elicited (Phase III) only after public values and solid decision analysis have been established (Phases I and II). In practice, COPE is implemented by extending traditional online deliberation with two small-group deliberations that address public value identification and decision analysis. This process has been deployed by State College municipal government as a formal method to engage the public. We report our findings from such field exercises and their implications to scaling up online deliberation for public decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信