70%边际税率的成本

Véronique de Rugy, J. Salmon
{"title":"70%边际税率的成本","authors":"Véronique de Rugy, J. Salmon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3690549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proposals for raising the maximum statutory tax rate to 70 percent, with dual objectives of generating additional revenue for new spending and curtailing inequality, are gaining attention among both academics and media commentators. <br><br>While the idea might be superficially attractive, there is little reason to believe that a 70 percent marginal tax rate will generate greater revenue or help lower-income Americans — or that it will accomplish these goals with minimal effect on the economy. On the contrary, similar marginal tax increases in neighboring Canada in 2015 actually produced less revenue: high-income earners paid billions less owing to behavioral adjustment. Higher tax rates, broadly speaking, discourage people from acquiring skills that could increase income and discourage businesses from expanding. In addition, research on the effects of these tax rates shows they will lower wage growth for lower-income American workers. Comparisons to historic norms about tax rates ignore the past four decades of globalization and international tax changes. Lastly, in the context of new spending proposals, this tax change is neither sufficient nor desirable.","PeriodicalId":145465,"journal":{"name":"Taxation eJournal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cost of a 70 Percent Marginal Tax Rate\",\"authors\":\"Véronique de Rugy, J. Salmon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3690549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proposals for raising the maximum statutory tax rate to 70 percent, with dual objectives of generating additional revenue for new spending and curtailing inequality, are gaining attention among both academics and media commentators. <br><br>While the idea might be superficially attractive, there is little reason to believe that a 70 percent marginal tax rate will generate greater revenue or help lower-income Americans — or that it will accomplish these goals with minimal effect on the economy. On the contrary, similar marginal tax increases in neighboring Canada in 2015 actually produced less revenue: high-income earners paid billions less owing to behavioral adjustment. Higher tax rates, broadly speaking, discourage people from acquiring skills that could increase income and discourage businesses from expanding. In addition, research on the effects of these tax rates shows they will lower wage growth for lower-income American workers. Comparisons to historic norms about tax rates ignore the past four decades of globalization and international tax changes. Lastly, in the context of new spending proposals, this tax change is neither sufficient nor desirable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将最高法定税率提高到70%的建议,正受到学术界和媒体评论员的关注,该建议具有为新支出创造额外收入和减少不平等的双重目标。虽然这个想法表面上可能很吸引人,但几乎没有理由相信70%的边际税率会产生更多的收入或帮助低收入的美国人,或者它会在对经济产生最小影响的情况下实现这些目标。相反,邻国加拿大在2015年类似的边际税收增加实际上产生了更少的收入:由于行为调整,高收入者少交了数十亿美元。从广义上讲,更高的税率会阻碍人们获得能够增加收入的技能,并阻碍企业扩张。此外,对这些税率影响的研究表明,它们将降低美国低收入工人的工资增长。将税率与历史标准进行比较忽略了过去40年的全球化和国际税收变化。最后,在新支出提案的背景下,这种税收变化既不充分,也不可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cost of a 70 Percent Marginal Tax Rate
Proposals for raising the maximum statutory tax rate to 70 percent, with dual objectives of generating additional revenue for new spending and curtailing inequality, are gaining attention among both academics and media commentators.

While the idea might be superficially attractive, there is little reason to believe that a 70 percent marginal tax rate will generate greater revenue or help lower-income Americans — or that it will accomplish these goals with minimal effect on the economy. On the contrary, similar marginal tax increases in neighboring Canada in 2015 actually produced less revenue: high-income earners paid billions less owing to behavioral adjustment. Higher tax rates, broadly speaking, discourage people from acquiring skills that could increase income and discourage businesses from expanding. In addition, research on the effects of these tax rates shows they will lower wage growth for lower-income American workers. Comparisons to historic norms about tax rates ignore the past four decades of globalization and international tax changes. Lastly, in the context of new spending proposals, this tax change is neither sufficient nor desirable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信