适应性有助于测试Juntas

R. Servedio, Li-Yang Tan, John Wright
{"title":"适应性有助于测试Juntas","authors":"R. Servedio, Li-Yang Tan, John Wright","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We give a new lower bound on the query complexity of any non-adaptive algorithm for testing whether an unknown Boolean function is a k-junta versus e-far from every k-junta. Our lower bound is that any non-adaptive algorithm must make \n \n[EQUATION] \n \nqueries for this testing problem, where c is any absolute constant < 1. For suitable values of e this is asymptotically larger than the O(k log k + k/e) query complexity of the best known adaptive algorithm [9] for testing juntas, and thus the new lower bound shows that adaptive algorithms are more powerful than non-adaptive algorithms for the junta testing problem.","PeriodicalId":246506,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptivity Helps for Testing Juntas\",\"authors\":\"R. Servedio, Li-Yang Tan, John Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We give a new lower bound on the query complexity of any non-adaptive algorithm for testing whether an unknown Boolean function is a k-junta versus e-far from every k-junta. Our lower bound is that any non-adaptive algorithm must make \\n \\n[EQUATION] \\n \\nqueries for this testing problem, where c is any absolute constant < 1. For suitable values of e this is asymptotically larger than the O(k log k + k/e) query complexity of the best known adaptive algorithm [9] for testing juntas, and thus the new lower bound shows that adaptive algorithms are more powerful than non-adaptive algorithms for the junta testing problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

我们给出了任何非自适应算法的查询复杂度的新下界,用于测试未知布尔函数是否为k-军政府与e-far,而不是每个k-军政府。我们的下界是任何非自适应算法都必须对这个测试问题进行[EQUATION]查询,其中c是< 1的任何绝对常数。对于合适的e值,它渐近地大于最著名的用于测试军团的自适应算法[9]的O(k log k + k/e)查询复杂度,因此新的下界表明自适应算法比非自适应算法对于军团测试问题更强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptivity Helps for Testing Juntas
We give a new lower bound on the query complexity of any non-adaptive algorithm for testing whether an unknown Boolean function is a k-junta versus e-far from every k-junta. Our lower bound is that any non-adaptive algorithm must make [EQUATION] queries for this testing problem, where c is any absolute constant < 1. For suitable values of e this is asymptotically larger than the O(k log k + k/e) query complexity of the best known adaptive algorithm [9] for testing juntas, and thus the new lower bound shows that adaptive algorithms are more powerful than non-adaptive algorithms for the junta testing problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信